Morshoth2011-03-08 16:26:58
New Beastmastery skill:
Bark
Syntax: ORDER BEAST BARK
Power Cost: 3
Super charging your beast with your personal power reserves causes them to go into a fury of barks and growls, scaring away one of the loyals following your target into the direction specified.
Basically this will scare off one of the things following them, at random, into the direction you request. Power cost could be raised if needed, but I just thought 3 would be a good minimum for this.
Bark
Syntax: ORDER BEAST BARK
Power Cost: 3
Super charging your beast with your personal power reserves causes them to go into a fury of barks and growls, scaring away one of the loyals following your target into the direction specified.
Basically this will scare off one of the things following them, at random, into the direction you request. Power cost could be raised if needed, but I just thought 3 would be a good minimum for this.
Tandrin2011-03-08 16:51:11
I would like it if it would be possible to read a sorcelglass scroll at an artifact vial that had been previously treated with a sorcelglass scroll so that you could change the appearance of the permanent vials you have.
Lendren2011-03-08 17:01:08
QUOTE (Tandrin @ Mar 8 2011, 11:51 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would like it if it would be possible to read a sorcelglass scroll at an artifact vial that had been previously treated with a sorcelglass scroll so that you could change the appearance of the permanent vials you have.
It might go through if it were limited to permanent (artifact) vials -- otherwise, it would let you extend the life of a vial indefinitely through repeated sorcelglass applications. (Which would be ridiculous to do, given how much sorcelglass costs versus a new vial, but nevertheless, I bet that's why it would be turned down.)
Unknown2011-03-08 17:23:35
That's easy. Put a cap on the maximum months left. The artifact-only idea is pretty easy, too, though.
Kiradawea2011-03-08 20:10:06
QUOTE (Morshoth @ Mar 8 2011, 05:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
New Beastmastery skill:
Bark
Syntax: ORDER BEAST BARK
Power Cost: 3
Super charging your beast with your personal power reserves causes them to go into a fury of barks and growls, scaring away one of the loyals following your target into the direction specified.
Basically this will scare off one of the things following them, at random, into the direction you request. Power cost could be raised if needed, but I just thought 3 would be a good minimum for this.
Bark
Syntax: ORDER BEAST BARK
Power Cost: 3
Super charging your beast with your personal power reserves causes them to go into a fury of barks and growls, scaring away one of the loyals following your target into the direction specified.
Basically this will scare off one of the things following them, at random, into the direction you request. Power cost could be raised if needed, but I just thought 3 would be a good minimum for this.
This would be one skill to basically cut Celestine/Nihilist offense in half, while doing little to Wiccans. So either it'd be too powerful, or not powerful enough.
Also, it would be used primarily for quest griefing.
Lendren2011-03-08 21:10:52
QUOTE (Zarquan @ Mar 8 2011, 12:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That's easy. Put a cap on the maximum months left.
That wouldn't stop the concern because the idea is, every time it gets down to 50 months you double it back up to 100, and thus, you can extend it forever. Yes, I know that no one would ever do that, but it's still the reason why the limit is there now, to prevent that.
Unknown2011-03-08 21:50:53
QUOTE (Lendren @ Mar 8 2011, 04:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That wouldn't stop the concern because the idea is, every time it gets down to 50 months you double it back up to 100, and thus, you can extend it forever. Yes, I know that no one would ever do that, but it's still the reason why the limit is there now, to prevent that.
Why on earth would you ever do that though? It would be -far- cheaper to just go haggle someone for their now stocking-deflated gems and then pour.
Lendren2011-03-08 21:52:20
QUOTE (Kialkarkea @ Mar 8 2011, 04:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Why on earth would you ever do that though?
QUOTE (Lendren @ Mar 8 2011, 04:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yes, I know that no one would ever do that...
The reasons the administration says no to things often have little to do with what anyone would or could actually do. (Remember windchimes?)
Lehki2011-03-08 22:47:02
A message when your Esteem hits 100%, or every time you influence while already at 100%. I forget to keep track of that a lot. o_o
I guess I could just go write a script for myself to do that, though.
I guess I could just go write a script for myself to do that, though.
Daraius2011-03-08 23:10:18
QUOTE (Lehki @ Mar 8 2011, 05:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
A message when your Esteem hits 100%, or every time you influence while already at 100%. I forget to keep track of that a lot. o_o
This would be great.
Unknown2011-03-08 23:57:00
Change it back to where you could sprint on water if you had waterwalk up *ragestomp*
Lendren2011-03-09 00:11:48
QUOTE (Pectus Dawneye @ Mar 8 2011, 06:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Change it back to where you could sprint on water if you had waterwalk up *ragestomp*
Buy a surfboard.
Neos2011-03-09 01:00:21
Allow the regular who command to work how bw works, allowing you to choose to see only people whose names begin with your chosen letter.
Lendren2011-03-09 01:10:10
QUOTE (AquaNeos @ Mar 8 2011, 08:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Allow the regular who command to work how bw works, allowing you to choose to see only people whose names begin with your chosen letter.
It has been argued that this would make many scrying skills and enchantments valueless since you could, with thirdeye, find people just as easily with just a WHO. I don't know if that logic applies in Lusternia where it seems that babies are born with gems of cloaking in their tiny little hands, but it is nevertheless argued.
Ytran2011-03-09 01:15:20
QUOTE (Lendren @ Mar 8 2011, 07:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It has been argued that this would make many scrying skills and enchantments valueless since you could, with thirdeye, find people just as easily with just a WHO. I don't know if that logic applies in Lusternia where it seems that babies are born with gems of cloaking in their tiny little hands, but it is nevertheless argued.
This is already possible with a couple #GAG triggers and some simple scripting.
Neos2011-03-09 01:17:53
QUOTE (Ytran @ Mar 8 2011, 08:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
This is already possible with a couple #GAG triggers and some simple scripting.
^This
In fact I have something that groups people by room, so it makes it much easier to read. As do a lot of other people. I've seen similar things in logs for a lot of other people.
Sylphas2011-03-09 01:20:45
It can be argued that at this point the only purpose of scry enchants is to counter gems of cloaking.
Unknown2011-03-09 01:52:14
Make it so the owner of a fate deck can TAP DECK to force it to deactivate?
Ssaliss2011-03-09 22:19:01
Not sure it'd qualify as a "simple" idea, but... How about a Domoth level above crown? It would be harder to get than crown, but it wouldn't add another blessing, nor would it bring in more power or essence. The perks? A bit harder to absolve (would require the opposite to be at the higher level as well), and you'd be able to keep a permanent major blessing instead of having it fade every now and then. Or just the possibility to reclaim the crown while you still have it.
Rivius2011-03-11 14:00:09
Make it so that warriors can use the flex emote.