Aubrey2010-08-03 04:27:45
There should be an emoticon that matches the in-game "eyeshift" or "furtive" emotes. Like an emoticon version of >_> or something.
Everiine2010-08-03 04:29:05
QUOTE (Aubrey @ Aug 3 2010, 12:27 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
There should be an emoticon that matches the in-game "eyeshift" or "furtive" emotes. Like an emoticon version of >_> or something.
is the reverse of >_> but I think it is more of a glare.
Aubrey2010-08-03 04:44:30
QUOTE (Everiine @ Aug 3 2010, 12:29 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
is the reverse of >_> but I think it is more of a glare.
Yeah...
the opposite of >_> =
glare =
Pretty much the exact same thing!
Shiri2010-08-03 05:24:59
< _ < isn't a glare, you guys just don't have ¬_¬ on your keyboards.
Unknown2010-08-03 07:05:31
QUOTE (Shiri @ Aug 3 2010, 01:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
< _ < isn't a glare, you guys just don't have ¬_¬ on your keyboards.
σ_σ
Shiri2010-08-03 07:23:33
That mainly just looks weird without the dots inside.
Unknown2010-08-03 07:27:16
QUOTE (Kialkarkea @ Aug 3 2010, 03:05 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
σ_σ
And I forgot the code for the dotted one.
Calixa2010-08-03 09:42:14
My name differing only one letter from another one means I get some amusing, but also very interesting mistells. Do type out names full if you wish to avoid embarrassment or worse, feed me sensitive information, especially of the in character kind.
Lendren2010-08-03 10:17:24
QUOTE (Everiine @ Aug 2 2010, 11:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
This counts as a ruckus? It's one person making a big deal out of nothing. Maybe I'm just not as sensitive to it anymore, but it doesn't seem like a big catastrophe to me.
Okay, hullabaloo then. The point is it's noisy.
Unknown2010-08-03 11:38:53
It's one of those slow motion car crashes. You can't do anything about it, and you can't look away. (People need to drive on the correct side of the street, too.)
Aoife2010-08-03 13:52:34
QUOTE (Zarquan @ Aug 3 2010, 07:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It's one of those slow motion car crashes. You can't do anything about it, and you can't look away. (People need to drive on the correct side of the street, too.)
Driving on the correct side of the street is clearly overrated.
Unknown2010-08-03 15:17:38
Speaking of driving on the right side of the road,
Save your limey trickery for King George, redcoat.
QUOTE (Shiri @ Aug 3 2010, 05:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
< _ < isn't a glare, you guys just don't have ¬_¬ on your keyboards.
Save your limey trickery for King George, redcoat.
Shiri2010-08-03 15:23:54
I don't even know what that symbol actually is other than "the thing that makes the eyes for a glare smiley", but I don't think it's British-only
Noola2010-08-03 15:33:56
Am I the only one who thinks ¬_¬ looks sleepy, not glary?
Shiri2010-08-03 17:13:16
Well, I guess if you think the downward-pointing lines are like, trails of sleep all over his face, then sure, but I had to squint for a bit to figure out how you could interpret that
Noola2010-08-03 17:30:08
QUOTE (Shiri @ Aug 3 2010, 12:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Well, I guess if you think the downward-pointing lines are like, trails of sleep all over his face, then sure, but I had to squint for a bit to figure out how you could interpret that
I see them more as eyelashes.
Shiri2010-08-03 17:31:00
The whole ¬ shape is the eye. like <.
Noola2010-08-03 17:36:57
QUOTE (Shiri @ Aug 3 2010, 12:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The whole ¬ shape is the eye. like <.
No, I get it. It just doesn't look very much like a glare to me. It looks more like a closed eye. Which makes me think sleepy.
Sylandra2010-08-03 18:36:03
QUOTE (Aubrey @ Aug 3 2010, 12:05 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yeah right.
The Collective loves you. Assimilate. Assimilate.
Kiradawea2010-08-03 19:25:14
QUOTE (Shiri @ Aug 3 2010, 05:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't even know what that symbol actually is other than "the thing that makes the eyes for a glare smiley", but I don't think it's British-only
Looks like the negation symbol used in Logic to me.