Druids

by Xenthos

Back to Common Grounds.

Saran2010-07-13 20:38:36
QUOTE (Noola @ Jul 14 2010, 06:07 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Why is Tinkering in the broken list?


Not really broken, not really good though.

Druids might need some fixes, though from memory the Hartstone had quite a few members at one stage and they just kinda... plummeted. Can't remember if this was before or after the dreamweaving report but I'm fairly certain it was before the most recent demesne changes.

QUOTE (Denust @ Jul 14 2010, 06:10 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The only thing I hear Druids (read: a few Druids on the forums) clamoring for is a new tertiary, but the only one I wouldn't take as a Druid is the one-off Dreamweaving because it's so weird and kind of situational.


This is more due to the sharing issues, as all druid skills except for the druidry spec are shared with a different archetype (the spec being shared between both guilds with few differences.

Dreamweaving, from memory, was one of the better options for druids but the report didn't help things and, along with runes, it is shared with mages so any changes need to be balanced against druidry, stag, crow, phantasms and all four elementalism specs. Similarly, ecology needs to be balanced against the commune bard specs.

Which in turn can lead to issues where you might want to make a change in druidry, that will require a change in dreamweaving, which will cause issues in aquamancy and so on... hence the desire for a unique skill for druids
Talan2010-07-13 20:38:45
QUOTE (Noola @ Jul 13 2010, 04:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Why is Tinkering in the broken list?

Many of the items in tinkering are not terribly useful. It's not "broken," but most people agree that it could use some improvements to make it worth having as a trade skill. Tinkering items are very expensive to make (75-125 commodity artisan items), compared to cosmic/elemental spellcraft, either of which are full of essentials, that can be enchanted onto rings (10 commodity items). Tinkering also lacks the abilities to enchant paintings and statues, so communes still have to outsource these things, which are important defenses in villages.
Unknown2010-07-13 20:39:51
QUOTE (Nienla @ Jul 13 2010, 01:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I lol'd and checked to see if that announce existed. sad.gif


laugh.gif It looks messed up on the default forum style, otherwise I would have left it up.

Aetolia has the some problems we do, I think. I stole it from the Ankyrean Archives page appropriately titled "Liaison report".
Noola2010-07-13 20:41:49
QUOTE (Talan @ Jul 13 2010, 03:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Many of the items in tinkering are not terribly useful. It's not "broken," but most people agree that it could use some improvements to make it worth having as a trade skill. Tinkering items are very expensive to make (75-125 commodity artisan items), compared to cosmic/elemental spellcraft, either of which are full of essentials, that can be enchanted onto rings (10 commodity items). Tinkering also lacks the abilities to enchant paintings and statues, so communes still have to outsource these things, which are important defenses in villages.



Well, I think the Tinkering stuff is cool, but I can see how not being able to enchant paintings and statues makes it kinda lopsided.
Unknown2010-07-13 20:42:02
QUOTE (Denust @ Jul 13 2010, 04:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Text wrapping makes me sad. Ah well, this is probably not going to happen. Athletics has way too many good buffs to pass up, especially Surge.


I dunno. Acrobatics could probably help a couple races be a bit better as warriors, by giving them the Dex boost and Hyperactivity. And Contort. Can't argue with Contort.
Nienla2010-07-13 20:44:25
Not to mention concerning giving Druids their own skill, I've even started fleshing out one called Haruspecy for Druids.
Shamarah2010-07-13 20:46:37
These arguments don't even make sense.

QUOTE (Nienla @ Jul 13 2010, 04:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
- Try to buff Druidry.
Response: LOLNO. YOU HAVE SAP. TOO POWERFUL. HURR HURR.


I thought you just said Sap was too weak? If you can't get anyone who isn't a Druid to agree it's too weak, chances are it's not. (Remember Pyromancers trying to defend original amputate?)

QUOTE
- Try to buff Crow for Druids.
Response: Can't do it because it would buff Warriors.


Just make it an active skill, and bam, Warriors will never touch it.

QUOTE
- Try to buff Runes for Druids
Response: Can't do it because it might make Mages too powerful.


What the censor.gif ? Who says this? Nobody says this, because Runes is godawful for mages and Rad is the only reason any mages ever take it. If you want to buff Runes for Mages then I say go for it.

QUOTE
- Try to buff Dreamweaving for Druids
Response: Dreamweaving is bugged to hell and has been for the last year, and won't get buffed because of Deepsleep.


So get it fixed. Envoy it if you have to.

All these arguments basically amount to "I want a remake because I don't like my class", which is idiotic. If you don't like the way Druids fight, maybe you shouldn't have gone Druid.
Sylphas2010-07-13 20:49:05
QUOTE (Shamarah @ Jul 13 2010, 04:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
All these arguments basically amount to "I want a remake because I don't like my class", which is idiotic. If you don't like the way Druids fight, maybe you shouldn't have gone Druid.


Stop making me want to go monk. sad.gif
Nienla2010-07-13 20:51:53
QUOTE (Shamarah @ Jul 13 2010, 04:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
These arguments don't even make sense.



I thought you just said Sap was too weak? If you can't get anyone who isn't a Druid to agree it's too weak, chances are it's not. (Remember Pyromancers trying to defend original amputate?)



Just make it an active skill, and bam, Warriors will never touch it.



What the censor.gif ? Who says this? Nobody says this, because Runes is godawful for mages and Rad is the only reason any mages ever take it. If you want to buff Runes for Mages then I say go for it.



So get it fixed. Envoy it if you have to.

All these arguments basically amount to "I want a remake because I don't like my class", which is idiotic. If you don't like the way Druids fight, maybe you shouldn't have gone Druid.



Actually, people do agree that Sap is weak. The issue is that Envoys is pretty much a warzone and that most envoys not of your org will pretty much reject any attempt you make. Sap is one of those taboo subjects that people will oppose regardless of whether it's underpowered or overpowered.

As far as Runes. People will oppose buffing them simply because they already have Psionics. People will reject Runes buffs on the grounds of Doublesling Haegl and Rad as well

As far as the Dreamweaving issues, we have tried to get it fixed. There are multiple Dreamweaving bugs that are so old, it's over a year and a half old but you wouldn't be able to tell because bugs don't record years.

Viynain, Celina, Krellan and pretty much anyone of warrant that has played a Druid equally agrees that the class is crap (Which is why they don't play the class anymore). It never ceases to amuse me when non-Druids say otherwise. I went Druid because my org needed one, not because I wanted to lolpwn everyone. I would've stayed Shadowdancer if I wanted to do that.
Sylphas2010-07-13 20:55:11
I don't see why Rad and doublesling Haegl mean you can't buff runes. Neither one of those contributes to a sap kill. I hate them both, but if you're doing ridiculous mana drains in group combat with a Harbinger, you're more than likely not doing much else.
Razenth2010-07-13 20:56:24
Have you forgotten about swoop already?
Nienla2010-07-13 20:56:35
QUOTE (Sylphas @ Jul 13 2010, 04:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't see why Rad and doublesling Haegl mean you can't buff runes. Neither one of those contributes to a sap kill. I hate them both, but if you're doing ridiculous mana drains in group combat with a Harbinger, you're more than likely not doing much else.


As I said. Opposing envoys will oppose runes buffs and cite those two as a reasoning. Anyway. We're taking up the Tweets thread with this. Back to Tweets.
Shamarah2010-07-13 20:57:49
QUOTE (Nienla @ Jul 13 2010, 04:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Actually, people do agree that Sap is weak. The issue is that Envoys is pretty much a warzone and that most envoys not of your org will pretty much reject any attempt you make. Sap is one of those taboo subjects that people will oppose regardless of whether it's underpowered or overpowered.

As far as Runes. People will oppose buffing them simply because they already have Psionics. People will reject Runes buffs on the grounds of Doublesling Haegl and Rad as well

As far as the Dreamweaving issues, we have tried to get it fixed. There are multiple Dreamweaving bugs that are so old, it's over a year and a half old but you wouldn't be able to tell because bugs don't record years.

Viynain, Celina, Krellan and pretty much anyone of warrant that has played a Druid equally agrees that the class is crap (Which is why they don't play the class anymore). It never ceases to amuse me when non-Druids say otherwise. I went Druid because my org needed one, not because I wanted to lolpwn everyone. I would've stayed Shadowdancer if I wanted to do that.


Who cares what the other envoys think? Envoy veto doesn't exist anymore, so if Druids really do need a buff, throw your report up, have the people who agree with you comment on it, and let the Oneiroi decide. They're actually quite good about not letting player pressure sway their decisions, in my experience.

This is pretty pointless anyway. Druids are not going to get a remake. So if you think they need buffs, submit those buffs, but get down out of your la-la-land dreamworld because if all you do is ask for Sap to be removed the admin are just going to press the reject button and nothing is going to happen.
Vathael2010-07-13 21:01:04
I'll say it. Sap sucks. If you are worried about fighting a Druid because of sap you suck and have worse things to worry about. I've cured out of sap with 3 Druids trying to stick it on me. I've cured out of sap with 3 people trying to web/shieldstun to keep it on. It's really not that difficult. I could manual out of sap locks when I used palisade and really even it could half decently do it for you.
Sylphas2010-07-13 21:01:50
QUOTE (Razenth @ Jul 13 2010, 04:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Have you forgotten about swoop already?


Nope. But skills all have opportunity costs. If you give them something else to do, they can't do them all at once. If you're sap locked and can't cure it, does it matter if they double haegl you once or twice then swoop? They could just as easily bleed you out with thorns and cudgel while maintaining the lock. The issue I have with double haegl and rad is group combat, not a progressive 1v1 kill. Sap is horrible in groups anyway since they can cleanse each other.
Unknown2010-07-13 21:03:27
QUOTE
Avechna the Avenger bows to you and commences the lesson in DruidRage.

Avechna the Avenger tells you of the e-peen war that is called "Envoy Reports," and how anyone and everyone is always out to nerf your class or make mind-boggling and unnecessary buffs to their own. He coughs and you can vaguely hear the name "Talkan."

Shaking His fist with uncontrolled rage, Avechna the Avenger tells you how Druids have been the buttmonkey of Envoy reports since after the days of Kalodan & Krellan went around annoying the hell out of non-Serenwilders.

With a single tear sliding down His face, Avechna the Avenger relates the tale of how Dreamweaving was once viable for Druids and that the dreamweaver battles between Alianna and Celina were the source of much lulz. Shaking His head, he says that this is now no longer true.

His face suddenly breaking into a smile, Avechna the Avenger tells you that - because this tertiary is new and shiny - it is obscenely overpowered and will remain so until the Special Report. He encourages you to "insta sum envois" because this skill is powered primarily by their grief and rage.

Avechna the Avenger tells you cherish these days of killing people outside your meld, because it's probably going to be nerfed into near unusability like Pyromancy, even though Mages have been killing people outside of their melds for years.

Avechna the Avenger bows to you - the lesson in DruidRage is complete.


Please don't take me seriously. laugh.gif
Saran2010-07-13 21:07:22
QUOTE (Nienla @ Jul 14 2010, 06:44 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Not to mention concerning giving Druids their own skill, I've even started fleshing out one called Haruspecy for Druids.


cough and cough
Xavius2010-07-13 21:10:09
blackeye.gif

The only relevant things that have changed since the days of "lolopdruids" are:

1) tea
2) acrobatics
3) the good ones left

Druid is an incredibly boring class to play. I don't want to go back to it. It's pointless out-of-demesne, which is frustrating. It's not underpowered in a demesne. It's not "relatively ok" in a demesne. It's death in a can. The only reason people struggle with druidry is that no one taught the current crop how to do it, so they do dumb things like try to sap with the demesne tick instead of 3-4 seconds before it on an off-balance opponent the way you're supposed to.

Now, if you'd like to post about how greentea ruined druids, go for it.
Talan2010-07-13 21:11:02
QUOTE (Noola @ Jul 13 2010, 04:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Well, I think the Tinkering stuff is cool, but I can see how not being able to enchant paintings and statues makes it kinda lopsided.

Cool-sounding maybe, but do you see many of the things actually in use? I don't. Bards use tempo (which is fabulous, don't get me wrong) and vivace/largo. Tinkerers themselves use roseglasses and make most of their gold on the basic enchantments + cubes. Non-bards have little use for the items. Even the top-tier, 'every second counts, every tiny advantage is useful,' people tend to skip over the tinkering enchantments. The horns, boxes, other timepiece enchantments, range from lackluster to not useful at all. Revelations to see the effects are up in a demesne that's currently hitting you? Piperhorn that only works in 2/6 orgs? Blasthorn that doesn't work on doors and takes 8 hits to remove the same icewall that one cast of ignite takes down? Compare to Scry, Cleanse, Gust, Levitate, Waterbreathe, Web, Icewall, Ignite, Acquisitio... It's more than a perceived disparity here. Sorry to cut in on the Druids suck no they don't yes they do no they don't!
Nienla2010-07-13 21:11:25
QUOTE (Xavius @ Jul 13 2010, 05:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
blackeye.gif

The only relevant things that have changed since the days of "lolopdruids" are:

1) tea
2) acrobatics
3) the good ones left

Druid is an incredibly boring class to play. I don't want to go back to it. It's pointless out-of-demesne, which is frustrating. It's not underpowered in a demesne. It's not "relatively ok" in a demesne. It's death in a can. The only reason people struggle with druidry is that no one taught the current crop how to do it, so they do dumb things like try to sap with the demesne tick instead of 3-4 seconds before it on an off-balance opponent the way you're supposed to.

Now, if you'd like to post about how greentea ruined druids, go for it.


Heh. I completely forgot about Greentea too. So there's a defense that blocks the ONE affliction that actually blocks Sap.