Oh right, thank you.

. Now I'm completely lost again. .

Unvote: Solanis

The reason I didn't want to vote for Gleip is because if you look back to the first Daily Prophet post,

"Irish Wizarding authorities have beseeched the Ministry to better protect international figures, citing the close proximity of their own star Quiddich player to the events (and attacks) of the past twenty-four hours."

What if Ileein's wake-upy on Gleip saved him from that and he's actually the Irish Quidditch player?

Naw I can't. I can't vote for the three.

Vote: Jack Sorry Jack, nothing personal, but with this much conflict and potential for valuable townie, I'd rather target the less active.

You know, there's a reason there's a deadline. Cause everything went silent after I stopped talking. There was plenty of opportunity to raise up whatever they wanted to then. Especially since most people weren't sold onto what I was saying.

And honestly, how far can discussion of 'okay we gotta protect the top hat guy' go?

Uh, because one of us can protect him, and one of us can't.

It's cool, I do need to step up the activity.

At the minute it seems like all that can be said (today, at least) has been, and with a deadline fast approaching, all we can do is make up our minds on the available intelligence. I think both Trinit and Solanis have compelling claims, and I don't want to risk lynching either, so as a placeholder I'm going to vote Gleip summarily, for lurking and his aggressive posting style.

You did gather that I've been at work these past days right? Ain't no lurking out of my own free will. Had I the chance, I'd be as aggressive today as any other day. Probably on Casilu, at least before she claimed Fudge, because creating an idea that I'm scum for being cautious, after I've been so aggressive doesn't sit well with me.

Why're people finding aggressiveness scummy anyway?

Well, I would imagine it has to do with who you were aggressive against.

Well considering that Vendetta, quite frankly, played surprisingly terrible this round, that seems a little on the lazy side.

Being a terrible player /= scum. I learned the basics of how to play from a wiki someone posted.

And being aggressive isn't scummy. However, going after me because of dumb luck is.

Come on, people. Don't let me be lynched because of the inactivity of players.

Alternately, we can either vote "No Lynch" or vote for Gleip, since he's about as close to lynching as I am.

VOTECOUNT

Trinit (4): Solanis, Dynami, Ileein, Gleip
Solanis (2): Trinit, Phoebus
Gleip (2): Ssaliss, Jack
Jack (1): Feyrll

DEADLINE: Three-ish hours.

I'm not really going to be too upset either way who gets lynched, but I'm still sticking by my being suspicious of Solanis. I just can't shake the feeling that he's entirely on the town's side.

It is so ridiculously fun to read along and see where this goes from here. I think I might be enjoying this more now than if I was still in play.

Sigh. Inactive players suck.

Unvote, VOTE:GLEIP just so someone may hopefully save me by voting for him as well and leaving us at no lynching.

If this results in a no-lynch I am going to throw a shoe at someone.

If this ends in a no-lynch, I'm "checking" to see if you're a Deatheater.

Your whole defence is "my power is really useful to the town don't lynch me! Please!".

Townies aren't usually that desperate to live and to be 'saved'.

Gah, I've gotta run and didn't have time to read the thread, so I'm just gonna

Vote: Gleip

For the points that I've mentioned before.