Shamarah2011-04-09 01:12:38
QUOTE
o Damage from inquisition will be delivered at the end instead of during
it.
it.
What in the heck? I submitted this ages ago (report 308) and it got rejected... and this change is actually way BETTER than what Placeus asked for in 557...
Sylphas2011-04-09 01:51:56
QUOTE (Eventru @ Apr 8 2011, 08:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Sior can get into the nitty-gritty of it, but the problem, as I understand, wasn't 'no new buffs for wiccans!' but 'the benefits we were okay with would take way, way, way too much time and require a lot of rewriting to code'.
Or so was my impression.
Or so was my impression.
I figured that was the reason, it's just sad to see nifty things with broad based support end up not being worth the time. (See also: any weather related flavor skills for Aeros.)
Calixa2011-04-26 11:54:47
QUOTE
ANNOUNCE NEWS #1763
Date: 4/26/2011 at 3:41
From: Sior the Anomaly
To : Everyone
Subj: March 2011 Envoy Reports
=== March 2011 Envoy Reports ===
o Channel (Dreamweaving) will work on blacked out and sleeping targets.
o Those under Bloodycaps (Shadowbeat) will heal less bleeding from CLOT.
o Warrior Tarot has been lowered to 2p and damagetype changed to
unblockable.
o Tidesweep (Tahtetso) does partial asphyxiation damage now and will
also chill one level.
o Amihai (Nekotai) damage and bleeding increased.
o Mucous now cures after ectoplasm when cleansing.
o Badluck (Paradigmatics) immunity time reduced.
o Catacombs map (from Tarot or domoth) now works with Rikenfriez and
Talthos.
A new functionality has been added to the commands used in all the
crafting trades to review lists of designs, which allows you to filter
those lists based on pretty much anything about the designs, in any
combination. Previously, you could do something like this:
JEWELRY BAUBLES
to see all the designs in the Baubles category, or
JEWELRY BAUBLES PENDANT
to see just the pendants. We've expanded this tremendously. Here are
some examples of what you can do:
JEWELRY BAUBLES APPEARANCE RED
shows anything in the baubles category with the word 'red' in the
appearance
JEWELRY BAUBLES DESIGNER ESTARRA
shows all the most fashionable of baubles designed by the Creatrix
JEWELRY BAUBLES DESIGNER -ESTARRA
shows only the lesser baubles designed by everyone but Estarra
JEWELRY BAUBLES CARTEL GEMCRAFTERS DESIGNER ESTARRA
shows only the baubles Estarra designed for the Gemcrafters cartel
JEWELRY ALL CARTEL GEMCRAFTERS DESIGNER ESTARRA
shows everything Estarra designed for the Gemcrafters cartel
This works with the JEWELRY, FORGING, SKINDESIGNS, BOOKBINDING, RECIPES,
ARTISAN, and TAILORING commands, and you can use ALL in place of the
design type on any of them. You can combine any number of restricting
conditions
each one is two words, the part of the design you want to
match, and the value to match against. Values can be preceded by a dash
or exclamation point to reverse the test. Designs will only match if
they match ALL the specified criteria. Here are all the criteria you can
test against:
APPEARANCE, DROPPED, EXAMINED, CONSUME, TASTE, SMELL, CLOSED,
TENT_APPEARANCE, TENT_DROPPED, TENT_EXAMINED, SEAL_TEXT:
matches if the word appears anywhere in that part of the description
DESCRIPTION:
matches if the word appears in ANY of the above
COMMENTS:
matches if the word appears in the comments
NOUN:
matches if the word is a noun you can use for the resulting object
you can just use "morning" for morning stars, since the value has to
be a single word. Note that the old syntax JEWELRY BAUBLES PENDANT
still works and is equivalent to JEWELRY BAUBLES NOUN PENDANT.
COMMS:
matches if the commodity is included in the design at all
CARTEL:
matches if the design is in that cartel
you can also use PUBLIC
OUTDOORS:
use YES or NO, to match artisan designs for outdoors or not
CONTAINER:
use YES or NO, to match artisan designs that are/aren't containers
DESIGNER:
matches if the specified person was the designer
use NOBODY for designs with no designer
SEALHOLDER_PERSON:
matches seals that are held by that person
SEALHOLDER_ORGANIZATION:
matches seals that are held by that organization
TATTOOWEIGHT:
matches if the tattoo weight is the specified amount or less
(if reversed, if it's more than the specified amount)
GOLDOUTLAY:
matches if a bookbinding gold outlay is the specified amount or less
(if reversed, if it's more than the specified amount)
WEAPONTYPE:
matches if the design can hold that weapon type
use the same names for weapon types as when making designs
=== Fixes ===
o Willpower will not be unnecessarily used anymore when potentially
clotting with firstaid.
o Summoning a new phial or starlight pendant when one already exists
correctly sets the decay time.
Penned by My hand on the 3rd of Dvarsh, in the year 294 CE.
Date: 4/26/2011 at 3:41
From: Sior the Anomaly
To : Everyone
Subj: March 2011 Envoy Reports
=== March 2011 Envoy Reports ===
o Channel (Dreamweaving) will work on blacked out and sleeping targets.
o Those under Bloodycaps (Shadowbeat) will heal less bleeding from CLOT.
o Warrior Tarot has been lowered to 2p and damagetype changed to
unblockable.
o Tidesweep (Tahtetso) does partial asphyxiation damage now and will
also chill one level.
o Amihai (Nekotai) damage and bleeding increased.
o Mucous now cures after ectoplasm when cleansing.
o Badluck (Paradigmatics) immunity time reduced.
o Catacombs map (from Tarot or domoth) now works with Rikenfriez and
Talthos.
A new functionality has been added to the commands used in all the
crafting trades to review lists of designs, which allows you to filter
those lists based on pretty much anything about the designs, in any
combination. Previously, you could do something like this:
JEWELRY BAUBLES
to see all the designs in the Baubles category, or
JEWELRY BAUBLES PENDANT
to see just the pendants. We've expanded this tremendously. Here are
some examples of what you can do:
JEWELRY BAUBLES APPEARANCE RED
shows anything in the baubles category with the word 'red' in the
appearance
JEWELRY BAUBLES DESIGNER ESTARRA
shows all the most fashionable of baubles designed by the Creatrix
JEWELRY BAUBLES DESIGNER -ESTARRA
shows only the lesser baubles designed by everyone but Estarra
JEWELRY BAUBLES CARTEL GEMCRAFTERS DESIGNER ESTARRA
shows only the baubles Estarra designed for the Gemcrafters cartel
JEWELRY ALL CARTEL GEMCRAFTERS DESIGNER ESTARRA
shows everything Estarra designed for the Gemcrafters cartel
This works with the JEWELRY, FORGING, SKINDESIGNS, BOOKBINDING, RECIPES,
ARTISAN, and TAILORING commands, and you can use ALL in place of the
design type on any of them. You can combine any number of restricting
conditions
each one is two words, the part of the design you want to
match, and the value to match against. Values can be preceded by a dash
or exclamation point to reverse the test. Designs will only match if
they match ALL the specified criteria. Here are all the criteria you can
test against:
APPEARANCE, DROPPED, EXAMINED, CONSUME, TASTE, SMELL, CLOSED,
TENT_APPEARANCE, TENT_DROPPED, TENT_EXAMINED, SEAL_TEXT:
matches if the word appears anywhere in that part of the description
DESCRIPTION:
matches if the word appears in ANY of the above
COMMENTS:
matches if the word appears in the comments
NOUN:
matches if the word is a noun you can use for the resulting object
you can just use "morning" for morning stars, since the value has to
be a single word. Note that the old syntax JEWELRY BAUBLES PENDANT
still works and is equivalent to JEWELRY BAUBLES NOUN PENDANT.
COMMS:
matches if the commodity is included in the design at all
CARTEL:
matches if the design is in that cartel
you can also use PUBLIC
OUTDOORS:
use YES or NO, to match artisan designs for outdoors or not
CONTAINER:
use YES or NO, to match artisan designs that are/aren't containers
DESIGNER:
matches if the specified person was the designer
use NOBODY for designs with no designer
SEALHOLDER_PERSON:
matches seals that are held by that person
SEALHOLDER_ORGANIZATION:
matches seals that are held by that organization
TATTOOWEIGHT:
matches if the tattoo weight is the specified amount or less
(if reversed, if it's more than the specified amount)
GOLDOUTLAY:
matches if a bookbinding gold outlay is the specified amount or less
(if reversed, if it's more than the specified amount)
WEAPONTYPE:
matches if the design can hold that weapon type
use the same names for weapon types as when making designs
=== Fixes ===
o Willpower will not be unnecessarily used anymore when potentially
clotting with firstaid.
o Summoning a new phial or starlight pendant when one already exists
correctly sets the decay time.
Penned by My hand on the 3rd of Dvarsh, in the year 294 CE.
OMFG I love the new tradeskill filters
![wub.gif](style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wub.gif)
![wub.gif](style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wub.gif)
![wub.gif](style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wub.gif)
Unknown2011-04-26 12:50:17
Time to borrow pliers and change specs. ![sad.gif](style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif)
![sad.gif](style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif)
Unknown2011-04-26 12:53:43
QUOTE (Zarquan @ Apr 26 2011, 07:50 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Time to borrow pliers and change specs. ![sad.gif](style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif)
![sad.gif](style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif)
I don't want to burst your bubble, but I'm 99% sure pliers are owner only.
Unknown2011-04-26 12:54:39
I heard otherwise. If so, then... /ragequit
Veyrzhul2011-04-26 12:57:08
QUOTE (Vendetta Morendo @ Apr 26 2011, 12:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't want to burst your bubble, but I'm 99% sure pliers are owner only.
Would make little sense otherwise, hehe.
Yea, it's a bit of a shame that they refused the axelord report (500) and this bc report. I wonder if they're actually aware that an estimated 10% or less of all combatant warriors are axelords or bonecrushers, and for good reason. It's doubly irksome because it means that alot of people will spec their armour for cutting, making it alot harder for the cutting specs, too.
Unknown2011-04-26 14:40:06
QUOTE (Veyrzhul @ Apr 26 2011, 08:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Would make little sense otherwise, hehe.
Yea, it's a bit of a shame that they refused the axelord report (500) and this bc report. I wonder if they're actually aware that an estimated 10% or less of all combatant warriors are axelords or bonecrushers, and for good reason. It's doubly irksome because it means that alot of people will spec their armour for cutting, making it alot harder for the cutting specs, too.
Yea, it's a bit of a shame that they refused the axelord report (500) and this bc report. I wonder if they're actually aware that an estimated 10% or less of all combatant warriors are axelords or bonecrushers, and for good reason. It's doubly irksome because it means that alot of people will spec their armour for cutting, making it alot harder for the cutting specs, too.
Don't misconstrue this as a complaint about pureblade, but even PB isn't ALL that common. PB gets by because its well rounded, and contributes well to groups. But most of the "scary" fighters are almost all Blademasters.
Is this purely due to pin? Pin/rend? A combination of solid afflictions, one really strong ability, and the double affliction capacity (that STILL feels like the better deal than the extra wounding PBs/ALs get)? I dunno. I'm not going to say it is over powered, because that results in all of said combatants pouring out of the wood work to say just how balanced everything is.
I'll merely point out that, when you think of the scary knights out there, they are almost always Blademasters. (And before that, bonecrushers, which is why small changes have big consequences).
Moral of the story? Pliers were (and remain) a good investment! If PB ever winds up bad relative to the other specs again, my only real regret will be lack of weapon aura when I'm orclach.
Rivius2011-04-27 04:14:28
QUOTE (Rainydays @ Apr 26 2011, 10:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Don't misconstrue this as a complaint about pureblade, but even PB isn't ALL that common. PB gets by because its well rounded, and contributes well to groups. But most of the "scary" fighters are almost all Blademasters.
Is this purely due to pin? Pin/rend? A combination of solid afflictions, one really strong ability, and the double affliction capacity (that STILL feels like the better deal than the extra wounding PBs/ALs get)? I dunno. I'm not going to say it is over powered, because that results in all of said combatants pouring out of the wood work to say just how balanced everything is.
I'll merely point out that, when you think of the scary knights out there, they are almost always Blademasters. (And before that, bonecrushers, which is why small changes have big consequences).
Moral of the story? Pliers were (and remain) a good investment! If PB ever winds up bad relative to the other specs again, my only real regret will be lack of weapon aura when I'm orclach.
Is this purely due to pin? Pin/rend? A combination of solid afflictions, one really strong ability, and the double affliction capacity (that STILL feels like the better deal than the extra wounding PBs/ALs get)? I dunno. I'm not going to say it is over powered, because that results in all of said combatants pouring out of the wood work to say just how balanced everything is.
I'll merely point out that, when you think of the scary knights out there, they are almost always Blademasters. (And before that, bonecrushers, which is why small changes have big consequences).
Moral of the story? Pliers were (and remain) a good investment! If PB ever winds up bad relative to the other specs again, my only real regret will be lack of weapon aura when I'm orclach.
Huh? PB can be scary too. Pinleg is bad, sure, but it's just about the sole hindering a blademaster really has until critical wounds. Against someone who cures well (and you'll be surprised to know how many people just don't) you can handle a single blademaster fine. In groups I agree pinleg can be pretty horrendous, and this is coming from a pinleg whore.
Take into contrast the fact that you can get heavy affs a little easier than we can, and that a tendon means you can get one more hit in, PB isn't bad at all and it certainly isn't something you can just shrug off and just choose to go blademaster.
I think AL and BC do suffer the hardest in the hindering department because they actually really have no means of keeping someone down. Knockdown is fun, but useless really, and even more so against acrobatics who'll just springup. Atleast with a tendon, or pinlegging someone who's already prone, you can keep them still to stick some affs on them before they stand up and start parrying again.
I think it would be sweet if all the envoys got together and worked on a solution for these guys, because I do feel bad for them. Obviously the furies are a bit out of touch with the needs of the players, though, I'll say that.
Also, Iasmos, I'd honestly just hold tight a bit more. I know how much you love your BC (for sentimental reasons now more than anything) and there's still always a chance at home there.
2) Also, yay for mucous fix.
3) total bias: not too keen on two monk guilds getting buffs vOv
Unknown2011-04-27 04:25:38
QUOTE (Rivius @ Apr 27 2011, 12:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Huh? PB can be scary too.
...I believe I said that I wasn't complaining about pureblade. Like, directly that. In the first sentence.
QUOTE
rest of post here
...I also said I wasn't calling pinleg overpowered, or asking for it to be nerfed. I was just pointing out the obvious- the vast majority of the "scary" knights are blademaster, with a spattering of "other" thrown in there.
Maybe I should get a chalkboard and make an acronym out of "PINLEG" and blame George Soros or something.
Neos2011-04-27 04:30:29
QUOTE (Rainydays @ Apr 27 2011, 12:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
...I believe I said that I wasn't complaining about pureblade. Like, directly that. In the first sentence.
...I also said I wasn't calling pinleg overpowered, or asking for it to be nerfed. I was just pointing out the obvious- the vast majority of the "scary" knights are blademaster, with a spattering of "other" thrown in there.
Maybe I should get a chalkboard and make an acronym out of "PINLEG" and blame George Soros or something.
...I also said I wasn't calling pinleg overpowered, or asking for it to be nerfed. I was just pointing out the obvious- the vast majority of the "scary" knights are blademaster, with a spattering of "other" thrown in there.
Maybe I should get a chalkboard and make an acronym out of "PINLEG" and blame George Soros or something.
Pure-bladers Instigating Nightly Loss of Every Game.
P.I.N.L.E.G
:shrug:
Dynami2011-04-27 04:31:31
QUOTE
o Catacombs map (from Tarot or domoth) now works with Rikenfriez and
Talthos.
Talthos.
Woo! Now I have to walk even less!
![happy.gif](style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/happy.gif)
Unknown2011-04-27 12:59:21
I also find it ironic that the Tahtetso upgrade goes through when the upgrade I requested was suggested by the Tahtetso Envoy. FML?
Veyrzhul2011-04-27 16:30:15
QUOTE (Zarquan @ Apr 27 2011, 01:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I also find it ironic that the Tahtetso upgrade goes through when the upgrade I requested was suggested by the Tahtetso Envoy. FML?
I still think it's a good report, and at this point, I'd rather give bc a tad too much than for the spec to get less and less used overall. Maybe some other report can fix it.
Malarious2011-04-27 18:11:59
QUOTE (Veyrzhul @ Apr 27 2011, 12:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I still think it's a good report, and at this point, I'd rather give bc a tad too much than for the spec to get less and less used overall. Maybe some other report can fix it.
I expect BC gets the same attention monks do, so either you will be ignored entirely or you can expect a minor report to get changes in. Bonecrusher used to be good because it stunned... alot, same for axelord. The fact the removal of stun "crippled" them shows how little the skillsets really had going for them at the time.
P.S. Get a cohesive plan and post that first so the direction shows when the reports are being considered.
Unknown2011-04-27 18:16:32
Bonecrushers aren't as broken as monks. I could've fixed them in two or three reports, tops. Something to hinder, something to help bypass parry, and maybe something to compensate for lack of bleeding-over-time damage. That's all I wanted.
Malarious2011-05-01 08:08:28
QUOTE (Zarquan @ Apr 27 2011, 02:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Bonecrushers aren't as broken as monks. I could've fixed them in two or three reports, tops. Something to hinder, something to help bypass parry, and maybe something to compensate for lack of bleeding-over-time damage. That's all I wanted.
Knockdown is your hinder/parry passer. Stun really was too much and would still be such. Bleeding can be done with runes or the crushaorta, but really, what do you plan for the bleeding over time to do? You would be better off with like a gut or chest action that could cause paralysis to drain mana. BC were abandoned because it would take several pieces of effort to fix them. Get other knights to support your reports and do an all in.
Unknown2011-05-01 11:57:52
You're pretty far off, actually.
Knockdown holds no one down, ever. You regain balance and stand up before I can swing again. Even a person who sits down and remains prone on purpose can still be missed or a different body part can be struck, just because warrior combat is still so random. Yay, swing-only afflictions (no, I don't mean Knockdown).
The stuns used to be what made BC unique among the specs and the immunity period was supposed to be the balancing factor, but most of the stuns were still removed and nothing useful given in return.
Bleeding runes for a BC do about 20 points of bleeding per hit, which adds up to nothing at all. CrushAorta is a critical level affliction that gets healed just in the normal process of healing one's health, so again, the bleeding doesn't add up to anything from that. I said "something to compensate for the lack of bleeding-over-time," not "I want bleeding damage." See the difference?
Knockdown holds no one down, ever. You regain balance and stand up before I can swing again. Even a person who sits down and remains prone on purpose can still be missed or a different body part can be struck, just because warrior combat is still so random. Yay, swing-only afflictions (no, I don't mean Knockdown).
The stuns used to be what made BC unique among the specs and the immunity period was supposed to be the balancing factor, but most of the stuns were still removed and nothing useful given in return.
Bleeding runes for a BC do about 20 points of bleeding per hit, which adds up to nothing at all. CrushAorta is a critical level affliction that gets healed just in the normal process of healing one's health, so again, the bleeding doesn't add up to anything from that. I said "something to compensate for the lack of bleeding-over-time," not "I want bleeding damage." See the difference?
Unknown2011-05-01 22:15:51
My big issue with stun was, it bascially served as offense and defense. It messed up defenses and made it easier to hit people where you wanted, and at the same time, it messed up offense and keeps them from building on you (especially in the case of other knights. Get in trouble? Start stunning while you cure the wounds down.) Unlike other specs, BC's didn't need to make a choice between slowing down an opponent's offense, and working towards a kill- why not both?
I really wouldn't want to see the stun train come back in to the tactic du jour.
As for bleeding over time damage, as a PB at least, that's never felt like a huge benefit. I mean, its present, but its not like pin/rend buildup or glom stuff.
I really wouldn't want to see the stun train come back in to the tactic du jour.
As for bleeding over time damage, as a PB at least, that's never felt like a huge benefit. I mean, its present, but its not like pin/rend buildup or glom stuff.
Sidd2011-05-03 20:24:45
Amputates do huge amounts of bleeding, just saying