Simple Questions 1

by Arin

Back to Common Grounds.

Unknown2010-04-28 01:21:55
If you own a cameo, and decided to sell it. Do you go back to your original race, or the one you used the cameo to changeling into?
Xenthos2010-04-28 01:48:18
QUOTE (Pectus Dawneye @ Apr 27 2010, 09:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If you own a cameo, and decided to sell it. Do you go back to your original race, or the one you used the cameo to changeling into?

You stay at whatever race you were at when you sold it.
Shaddus2010-04-28 02:23:17
I'm tempted to buy the god package of artifacts (symbol and font). Besides being able to touch the symbol to change it to your god's symbol, what do both of these do?

Edit: And no, I don't have three vacuums on one character. I have three characters which managed to get their vacuum. Geeze, you people need to quit picking on my alt-army.
Unknown2010-04-28 02:29:04
QUOTE (Shaddus Mes'ard @ Apr 27 2010, 09:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm tempted to buy the god package of artifacts (symbol and font). Besides being able to touch the symbol to change it to your god's symbol, what do both of these do?



Font = offer to your god from anywhere
Symbol = 25% reduction on karma costs for personal shrine powers
Rael2010-04-28 02:29:42
QUOTE (Shaddus Mes'ard @ Apr 27 2010, 08:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm tempted to buy the god package of artifacts (symbol and font). Besides being able to touch the symbol to change it to your god's symbol, what do both of these do?

Edit: And no, I don't have three vacuums on one character. I have three characters which managed to get their vacuum. Geeze, you people need to quit picking on my alt-army.


Symbol of the Gods
- If you are a member of an order, TOUCH SYMBOL to attune it to
your god.
- The symbol reduces the cost of karma shrine powers by 25%.

The font allows you to make offerings to your God(dess) from anywhere. I think it's like a portable but crippled shrine.

How do I check the number of posts each participant has contributed to a forum thread? Let's see how busy Pectus has been in "The write something about the poster above you thread." suspicious.gif
Unknown2010-04-28 02:33:17
QUOTE (Rael @ Apr 27 2010, 09:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
How do I check the number of posts each participant has contributed to a forum thread? Let's see how busy Pectus has been in "The write something about the poster above you thread." suspicious.gif


Next to the topic, there should be "replies". Click on the number of replies, and it should open a small window that breaks down how many from who.
Zalandrus2010-04-28 13:23:43
-Which should I aim for: Bookbinding (for mastertome), Forging (for master armor), or the gem that cloaks you on WHO (can't remember name right now)?

-How much of an effect do combat styles have, and which one is considered best for bashing? PvP?

-AG or Treant?
Zallafar2010-04-28 13:32:26
QUOTE (Zalandrus Meyedsun @ Apr 28 2010, 06:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
-Which should I aim for: Bookbinding (for mastertome), Forging (for master armor), or the gem that cloaks you on WHO (can't remember name right now)?

-How much of an effect do combat styles have, and which one is considered best for bashing? PvP?

-AG or Treant?

Yeesh, you posted this under Simple Questions? A "gem of cloaking" hides you on who and costs 400 credits.
Rael2010-04-28 14:06:38
QUOTE (Zalandrus Meyedsun @ Apr 28 2010, 07:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
-Which should I aim for: Bookbinding (for mastertome), Forging (for master armor), or the gem that cloaks you on WHO (can't remember name right now)?

-How much of an effect do combat styles have, and which one is considered best for bashing? PvP?

-AG or Treant?


I think you should give the credits to Rael. He really needs them. suspicious.gif
Unknown2010-04-28 14:29:00
Master armour.

The combat styles are pretty much describe in the ABs. Aggressive is what I use for PvE.

I'm biased.
Eldanien2010-04-28 15:21:32
Spectacles of Seeing - does is automatically show hidden exits in room descriptions/exit line, or does it just make SECRETS infallible?
Lendren2010-04-28 15:23:04
The latter, unfortunately. Kind of disappointing.
Unknown2010-04-28 15:41:32
The OBSERVE without equilibrium is marginally more useful than SECRETS with 100% certainty.
Xenthos2010-04-28 16:05:06
QUOTE (Lendren @ Apr 28 2010, 11:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The latter, unfortunately. Kind of disappointing.

I thought they made it make SECRETS take no eq, since it is infallible now even without said spectacles...
Shiri2010-04-28 16:17:03
Is it? Since when? Last I heard about that was years ago and it got rejected.
Xenthos2010-04-28 16:59:17
QUOTE (Shiri @ Apr 28 2010, 12:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Is it? Since when? Last I heard about that was years ago and it got rejected.

It was rejected in a report and then accepted in a forum-thing later as I recall it.

All I can say is I don't have one of those and my secrets is 100% of the time now; we discussed it with them and told them it was completely useless as it was. I just don't know what change they made to the artifact itself.

And... since a couple of weeks after they rejected it, I believe. tongue.gif
Zynna2010-04-28 17:26:43
Secrets requires equilibrium and balance, and it consumes equilibrium even with the spectacles.
Unknown2010-04-28 18:20:29
What's the forestals (Seren/Glom)' RP view of advanced technology? Is it a blight like they consider cities to be?
Doman2010-04-28 18:30:20
Eh, I've not seen anything bad with technology, it's more a "Cities build over nature and displace it" than "TECHNOLOGY BAD!"
Unknown2010-04-28 18:39:13
It's a good question, I don't think the game has addressed it too much but not all technology is viewed the same way most likely. Aetherships (if you'd call them technology) are surely fine since they don't take up space, whereas Magnagora's gas lamps are probably not fine.