kiriwe2009-03-02 03:09:02
QUOTE (Shiri @ Mar 1 2009, 09:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What the hell? I didn't say WE might as well kill Pikachu. I said the SCUM might as well kill Pikachu because the big 4 is already gone.
You did not say scum in your post.
Shiri2009-03-02 03:09:27
QUOTE (Kiriwe y'Kaliath @ Mar 2 2009, 03:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You did not say scum in your post.
Ok, fine, let me find it.
Shiri2009-03-02 03:10:15
QUOTE (Kiriwe y'Kaliath @ Mar 2 2009, 03:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You did not say scum in your post.
O RLY.
kiriwe2009-03-02 03:13:04
QUOTE (Shiri @ Mar 1 2009, 10:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I fail to see what you are saying. You suggest killing Pikachu in that post
Shiri2009-03-02 03:15:01
QUOTE (Kiriwe y'Kaliath @ Mar 2 2009, 03:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I fail to see what you are saying. You suggest killing Pikachu in that post
.................
Unvote Vote: Kiriwe.
I can't believe that after multiple readings you simply cannot process what I said, so I can only assume it's a really really bad attempt at getting me out of the way.
Daganev2009-03-02 03:15:55
let me translate for you:
"On that note is there even any point to keeping pikachu alive now?: Means: Should we focus our protection efforts on pikachu?
She doesn't win with some of us (I'm guessing she's with the beasts?) so a kill on her is as good as on anyone else for the scum, right?
Means:
If the skum end up killing pikachu tonight, there is no loss to us, because Pikachu now only counts as a beast and not the big 4
Shiri was wrong here, and Pikachu does need to be kept alive.. but he didn't suggest we lynch/kill pikachu.
"On that note is there even any point to keeping pikachu alive now?: Means: Should we focus our protection efforts on pikachu?
She doesn't win with some of us (I'm guessing she's with the beasts?) so a kill on her is as good as on anyone else for the scum, right?
Means:
If the skum end up killing pikachu tonight, there is no loss to us, because Pikachu now only counts as a beast and not the big 4
Shiri was wrong here, and Pikachu does need to be kept alive.. but he didn't suggest we lynch/kill pikachu.
Daganev2009-03-02 03:17:01
If Kiriwe was scum , she would be keeping her vote on Fania right now.
Fania2009-03-02 03:17:03
Back. I decided not to tell who I am. It's just a stupid thing to do.
kiriwe2009-03-02 03:17:25
QUOTE (daganev @ Mar 1 2009, 10:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
let me translate for you:
"On that note is there even any point to keeping pikachu alive now?: Means: Should we focus our protection efforts on pikachu?
She doesn't win with some of us (I'm guessing she's with the beasts?) so a kill on her is as good as on anyone else for the scum, right?
Means:
If the skum end up killing pikachu tonight, there is no loss to us, because Pikachu now only counts as a beast and not the big 4
Shiri was wrong here, and Pikachu does need to be kept alive.. but he didn't suggest we lynch/kill pikachu.
"On that note is there even any point to keeping pikachu alive now?: Means: Should we focus our protection efforts on pikachu?
She doesn't win with some of us (I'm guessing she's with the beasts?) so a kill on her is as good as on anyone else for the scum, right?
Means:
If the skum end up killing pikachu tonight, there is no loss to us, because Pikachu now only counts as a beast and not the big 4
Shiri was wrong here, and Pikachu does need to be kept alive.. but he didn't suggest we lynch/kill pikachu.
Oh, ok. The way he wrote it was kinda weird.
Unvote
Fania2009-03-02 03:17:37
QUOTE (daganev @ Mar 1 2009, 07:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If Kiriwe was scum , she would be keeping her vote on Fania right now.
Or she's an Air head.
Daganev2009-03-02 03:17:59
QUOTE (Fania @ Mar 1 2009, 07:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Back. I decided not to tell who I am. It's just a stupid thing to do.
only explanation here is that you are scum.
Shiri2009-03-02 03:18:10
QUOTE (daganev @ Mar 2 2009, 03:17 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If Kiriwe was scum , she would be keeping her vote on Fania right now.
Ok...that does make some amount of sense...but that's if she was playing optimally, which this latest line of posts and her newbie scum practice of "try to vote no lynch" prove she isn't already. So it's not infeasible for her to be scum.
kiriwe2009-03-02 03:19:05
QUOTE (Fania @ Mar 1 2009, 10:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Back. I decided not to tell who I am. It's just a stupid thing to do.
Why?
Diamondais2009-03-02 03:19:25
At this point in time, there is no point in hiding who you are.
Vote Fania
Vote Fania
Fania2009-03-02 03:20:59
QUOTE (Shiri @ Mar 1 2009, 07:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Ok...that does make some amount of sense...but that's if she was playing optimally, which this latest line of posts and her newbie scum practice of "try to vote no lynch" prove she isn't already. So it's not infeasible for her to be scum.
I think Kirwe's actions are more newbie like, so she might not fall under the same category as other people. I do think it's strange that she's not a loyalist, wouldn't she be loyal to Link?
QUOTE (Kiriwe y'Kaliath @ Mar 1 2009, 07:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Why?
Because
Fania2009-03-02 03:22:27
I'm not scum. Four votes...you people are crazy. You'll lynch anyone.
Shiri2009-03-02 03:22:59
I think Fania is desperately trying to tell us that she isn't allowed to roleclaim, because hiding it would be retarded at this point.
However, I don't think we can really take that risk...Unvote (again, kiriwe is going down next if we're wrong about Fania) Vote Fania
However, I don't think we can really take that risk...Unvote (again, kiriwe is going down next if we're wrong about Fania) Vote Fania
Daganev2009-03-02 03:23:22
Fania, at this point, if you are not scum, then you will likely be killed by the scum tonight, because nobody is going to be protecting you. What possible reason do you have for not telling us who you are?
Fania2009-03-02 03:24:21
So two more votes and I'm lynched? Maybe I should role reveal....
Daganev2009-03-02 03:24:38
QUOTE (Shiri @ Mar 1 2009, 07:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think Fania is desperately trying to tell us that she isn't allowed to roleclaim, because hiding it would be retarded at this point.
However, I don't think we can really take that risk...Unvote (again, kiriwe is going down next if we're wrong about Fania) Vote Fania
However, I don't think we can really take that risk...Unvote (again, kiriwe is going down next if we're wrong about Fania) Vote Fania
I was thinking the same thing, but I gave her a chance to say as much when asked
"Is there any reason you arn't telling us?" And she didn't respond.
She also implied that she might roleclima after eating dinner, but then "changed her mind"