Unknown2009-03-04 15:17:26
If they're influenceable or recruitable by demons, they'd become scum, so we'd have to banish them anyway!
Diamondais2009-03-04 15:22:39
QUOTE (Silferras @ Mar 4 2009, 10:17 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If they're influenceable or recruitable by demons, they'd become scum, so we'd have to banish them anyway!
Yes, unless they're able to be "saved" later on.
But someone with that power would have to confirm it, but considering we know nothing about anyone. Don't mention it, as it will make you a target of the scum.
Daganev2009-03-04 16:25:21
FUBAR!
Zynna2009-03-04 17:35:19
QUOTE (Silferras @ Mar 4 2009, 09:17 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If they're influenceable or recruitable by demons, they'd become scum, so we'd have to banish them anyway!
Humans can always be saved! It makes me suspicious that you would think otherwise...
Unvote. Vote Silferras
Ayisdra2009-03-04 18:00:28
While saving the humans is a good thing, I think they are a minor role in this, we should be trying to find who the scummy demons are. That is unless the humans somehow can kill us angel folk quicker than the demons then maybe they would be trying to recruit them to the demons.
Unknown2009-03-04 18:20:21
QUOTE (Solanis @ Mar 3 2009, 10:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Does that suggest that there are humans as well as angels? Hmm.
Restatement of the obvious, but somewhat quietly, perhaps to early-on establish in the back of our minds that they are a "goodie" and to increase post-count to avoid a "lurker" lynching. Also, I doubt that Caerulo would have come up again via random chance, with two votes already on her.
Vote: Solanis
Plus, anyone with such a light-oriented name is clearly a demon.
Daganev2009-03-04 21:42:27
FUBAR!
Unknown2009-03-04 21:45:08
I'm guessing this is a clue of some sort, and not Daganev spasming in some Turret's-like seizure at his own game's activity.
Doman2009-03-04 21:54:27
well, considering the discussion, I don't think it's a good idea to explain why I know about humans, but the way I can confirm them has nothing to do with converting to either side.
Arix2009-03-04 22:36:01
The Fubar thing is a search term for Daganev to use in case he comes back to like 50 pages
Unknown2009-03-05 02:05:50
QUOTE (Sadhyra @ Mar 5 2009, 02:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Restatement of the obvious, but somewhat quietly, perhaps to early-on establish in the back of our minds that they are a "goodie" and to increase post-count to avoid a "lurker" lynching. Also, I doubt that Caerulo would have come up again via random chance, with two votes already on her.
Vote: Solanis
Plus, anyone with such a light-oriented name is clearly a demon.
Vote: Solanis
Plus, anyone with such a light-oriented name is clearly a demon.
Him! Am I so androgynous?
Unknown2009-03-05 02:07:08
QUOTE (Zynna @ Mar 5 2009, 01:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Humans can always be saved! It makes me suspicious that you would think otherwise...
Unvote. Vote Silferras
Unvote. Vote Silferras
Like I said, it was all speculation. Presumably deflated by Doman's post now.
And unless you're being facetious, I don't see how you can be so certain about that either.
Unknown2009-03-05 02:07:27
Hrm. Give me a moment to digest what Doman has said.
Unknown2009-03-05 02:42:12
On one hand, I have been concerned that whatever Doman reveals would benefit the demons more. But on the other hand, the demons probably already know more about humans than we do. I'm still undecided as to what to do with Doman.
I would have taken Zynna's comment on Silferras lightly, but you voted for her. Also, it seems clear from the win condition that we need not care about whether the humans are 'saved' or not. This is slightly strange.
Solanis and Sadhyra, hrm, thinking on that.
I would have taken Zynna's comment on Silferras lightly, but you voted for her. Also, it seems clear from the win condition that we need not care about whether the humans are 'saved' or not. This is slightly strange.
Solanis and Sadhyra, hrm, thinking on that.
Arix2009-03-05 02:44:27
What's Sadhyra's deal?
Zynna2009-03-05 02:46:48
Who else hasn't voted at all? Enero? Anyone else?
Unknown2009-03-05 02:49:25
QUOTE (Arix @ Mar 5 2009, 10:44 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What's Sadhyra's deal?
Actually, I worded it badly. I meant Sadhyra's comment on Solanis.
Ayisdra2009-03-05 02:52:57
Has Enero even posted yet?
Ayisdra2009-03-05 02:55:24
Also, Rika has only posted once (and that wasn't even two words.)
Unknown2009-03-05 03:00:23
No, Enero has yet to have posted.
Erm, Rika posted 5 times. Although, the first post doesn't really count.
Erm, Rika posted 5 times. Although, the first post doesn't really count.