QUOTE (Shaddus Mes'ard @ Apr 22 2009, 06:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It's not just your guild 
I mean, I can understand if a guild needs someone up to where they can guildfavour or whatever. But mass favours just irk me.
I mean, I can understand if a guild needs someone up to where they can guildfavour or whatever. But mass favours just irk me.
I think the idea is so that secretaries can guildfavour for the tests that they have to give.
QUOTE (Shaddus Mes'ard @ Apr 22 2009, 09:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It's not just your guild
I mean, I can understand if a guild needs someone up to where they can guildfavour or whatever. But mass favours just irk me.
I mean, I can understand if a guild needs someone up to where they can guildfavour or whatever. But mass favours just irk me.
It's a necessary evil.
Sometimes, the person is just worth those favours anyways.
QUOTE (Cambrian @ Apr 5 2010, 06:08 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I find it odd that guild ranks are controlled by prefab game mechanics, rather than senior guild members... especially if said ranks don't really do anything appreciable, and elected/appointed leaders get an automatic bump anyway.
Ah well, yet another head-scratcher from the crazy world of Lusternia to toss on the pile.
Ah well, yet another head-scratcher from the crazy world of Lusternia to toss on the pile.
This is an excessive necro.
