What "WHAT"? This past page has been nothing but semantic nonsense on all sides and it's giving me a migraine.

Fine, but if you think someone isn't scummy, you shouldn't be voting for them, just because you easily get headaches...

Sorry, the implication was that she -is- acting scummy with her purposeful vagueness and lack of real contribution (or, in some cases, almost hindering contribution with her words).

Ah ok, I missunderstood you. It sounded more like "I don't like this person, so I'm going to vote them off so I don't have to talk to them anymore" type of vote. Which is just really unhelpful.

Aye, I think the Zynna thing was likely a slip of the tongue. I'm not quite willing to overlook her yet, because it seems she gets almost aggressively defensive whenever someone starts to suggest she might be scum.

Still, after looking back, Fania was doing the same thing, jumping at people and pointing fingers away from herself...

For now I think I'll Vote: Fania, FoS: Zynna, and make myself a drink or something. Both are getting really tetchy, and I wanna know why.

Vote Count

" 'But I don't want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness. I want sin.'
'In fact,' said Mustapha Mond, 'you're claiming the right to be unhappy.'
'All right then,' said the Savage defiantly, 'I'm claiming the right to be unhappy.' " --Aldous Huxley, Brave New World

Silferras - 3 (Llandros, Shiri, Rika)
Fania - 3 (Furien, Aerotan, Daganev)
Zynna - 2 (Kiradawea, Solanis)

10 to lynch.

Daganev's votes obviously don't work anymore.

Am I missing something important..? Is should be three for Silferras, Three for Fania, and none for me...After all, Daganev switched votes, and Shiri, impressive though he is, cannot vote for two different people...

or can he?

asdfsafdsafdsafdsafdas fixed

Dude what the hell are all you non-voters doing? We have like 20 people in the game, there's no way we should have 8 votes.

Unvote Vote: Fania to finally get this stuff going. (the VA/VT thing was obvious, especially since she said VT earlier in the thread)

Fania is confusing the hell out of me, I don't know if she's being weird on purpose, but I don't like it.

VOTE: FANIA

Shiri brings up a good point

People who were not Voting at the time that Shiri made the comment:

Arix 49
Fania 37
Zynna 36
Kiriwe y'Kaliath 34
casilu 26
Reiha 25
Silferras 16
Esano 13
Serella 9


If Fania comes up town, we should look at this list again.

We need 4 more votes on Fania, then let her roleclaim.

... why would the people not voting be suspicious if she comes up town?

And since I'm the one that brought up suspicion on her


VOTE:FANIA

In the scheme of things, I think it would be worth .5 points for not voting this late in the game, waiting for a bandwagon to join, and being lurky. Since we are "undecided" at this point, not voting is the better bet, waiting for us town folks to find something on someone.

It's not an if/then thing in the sense that it's a causal relationship. But if Fania comes up town, we were wrong about her being a scum, and thus the next targets we should look at should be the people not voting and thus not contributing/lurking (I still don't think Reiha's said a single thing all day.)

I should note, btw, that Silferras always does that lurking without really lurking thing, she's just like that. But I'm not saying we shouldn't lynch her.

There are currently 6 votes on Fania, 4 more votes and it will be a lynch. 3 more votes will be too close to a ninja lynch. I will be highly suspicious of Fania if she does not roleclaim with two more votes.

You two are agreeing. Something is off.