I like my coffee like I like my women: lightly tanned, subtle, and sweet.

Ew, coffee. How can you people drink that stuff.

With twice as much sugar, milk and cocoa I can drink it. I just have to keep my eyes closed, hold my breath and drink it fast.

Cup in hand, tilt head back, open mouth.

Though I'm still trying to figure out the connection between cofee and antonio

daganev seems really quick to jump to conclusions, makes him seem paranoid. But from reading other mafia games, that generally seems to be his way of playing. So not sure if I should be looking at that too close or just letting it go.
Xavius just seems generally aggressive, nothing wrong with that. He doesn't seem, to me, to be acting out of the ordinary either. I could always be wrong with my observations.
And the following bandwagon isn't just a scum thing, it's town too. When you're unsure of what to do, and a deadline is 'round the corner or some such jumping on a bandwagon seems the thing to do ya? So I try to take ya'lls bandwagons with a grain of salt. tis one reason I haven't done either a random vote (not overly fond of it, tbh. but I understand the reasons on the first day or to get things rolling on a slow day) or bandwagon vote. (of course my little brain doesn't always comprehend all that is said >.>)
Going to reread the thread and give the posts some more serious thoughts. Only reason why Dag and Xavius have comments on them is cuz well...they be loud voices.

I'm trying to figure out if I should suddenly make a rule that coffee induces random dayends. *urge*

Casilu has too many cups of coffee lined up for that to be fair.

A single drop of milk is all it takes to destroy the pure black magic in the cup.


In truth, I rarely drink coffee, but when I do, no cream, no sugar, I enjoy it for what it is.

Anyway, I think I'll drop my vote finally.

VOTE:ARIX

Allright, it looks like nobody is going to have more perspectives for me to consider regarding Arix/rika/furien/lurkers.

I'll throw my hat in with the Furien vote.
Vote Furien

We have direct proof of contradiction (a fancy way to say lieing?), and apparently he suddenly understands my reasoning (though I repeated it 3 times) without making further comment.

Arix, I'm going to have to say is acting his usual "day start" way, since we have no evidence to the contrary, and Rika will be an obvious next choice.
As for the lurkers, I'm hoping that they speak thier minds regarding Furien soon. We still only have 12 out of 22 people voting.

I guess that makes me lucky number 13?

I can switch from Rika get behind the Furien vote too for the reasons in my post I made earlier.

Unvote. Vote: Furien

Aaaand as a point of honour. I was wrong, it's not Antonio, It's Mr. Armando

*sadface* I still don't get it.

Let's see what Furien has to say about the votes piling up.

I don't understand the reason for voting for Furien. from reading his posts it seems to me that he has been rather consistent with his vote. First one was a random one, second for Dag. His reasoning followed Xavius logic and has stated that he felt the "attack" on Llandros for rolefishing was flimsy. Seems to me that there he's not back peddling, or maybe I'm missing something?

I'll slim down Zynna's post for you:

QUOTE (Xavius @ Jul 24 2009, 01:32 PM) *
Hai guyz the topic title is hero mafia and we all haz rollz and they's not tarot cards!!!1

I mean, really. You guys have your roles. They're not tarot cards. You want to vote for Llandros because he said it's not a tarot card, but a hero, as mentioned at the top of the page?

If anything, maybe you should be jumping Daganev for thinking that's weird.

QUOTE (Furien @ Jul 24 2009, 01:43 PM) *
This is logic I like. Unvote
Vote: Daganev


QUOTE (Furien @ Jul 27 2009, 12:01 AM) *
That's the particular post that bothers me.

I'll admit that Llandros was fishing a bit but I don't see why Daganev feels the need to throw it back at Xavius, who...isn't, at all.

QUOTE (Furien @ Jul 27 2009, 01:18 PM) *
I already gave you my reason why- the claim of rolefishing on Llandros was flimsy at best and of minimal value regardless of how he was answered.

Here is my recap of what happened:

Llandros: Wierd, I'm moon and a hero but not a tarot card, what about other people?
Daganev: only scum would be fishing for info, vote llandros.
Xavius: WTF? terrible logic, even for day one, vote daganev
Othero: yeah thats bad, vote daganev
Daganev: Sometimes someone who isn't town will try to find out town themes to make a fake claim.
Othero: Oh right, forgot about that, unvote daganev, vote llandros
Furien: Xavius was right, vote Daganev
Rika: Yeah! vote daganev
Daganev: Why are people following xavius's without giving thier own logic? what I said might be wrong, but its plausible.
Rika: I'm keep my vote on daganev for being agressive
Furien: Sure, ok, I can see the point about llandros, but then why are you attacking Xavius?
Daganev: I'm not attacking xavius, I'm attacking people who follow him without giving thier own logic?
Furien: Well, llandros wasn't rolefishing at all, and your logic was just terrible, so I'm voting for daganev
Daganev: llandros wasn't rolefishing he was fake claim fishing.
Zynn: Look how Furien went back on his argument, and backpeddled.
furien: @daganev: oh ok NOW you make sense. unvote.

Is that an acurate recap?

*confused*

I can see the contradiction present, but it's more the random unvote-without-explanation-despite-being-accused-thing that makes me peer strangely at Furien. Plus it's better than anything we have on anyone else. Vote: Furien.

That's going to be the worst mistake of your life to say the least.

Who is that directed at?