Wow. How many times do I have to explain? I only voted for Solanis in the first place because nothing happened. Then Ilyarin and AtS voted to make it ten. I unvoted so Solanis could at least have a chance to claim. Solanis finally came on, said he would claim and then... didn't. I revoted for him to actually make him claim. Arix then did his idiotic thing.

Please, if you're going to point the finger at me again, don't use the "she revoted for Solanis" reason. I've already rejected that multiple times.

Celina? you can take off the Rika suit now

I hope that's not directed towards me as I've specifically said multiple times that the reason I find you scummy is not that you voted, but that you say I'm scummy for doing basically the exact same thing you did. If you wouldn't have targeted me after Solanis' death with the reason you gave, I would've said, "Man, I had the situation wrong, Rika had it wrong, Ilyarin had it wrong, Arix CERTAINLY had it wrong, and so did the other seven people". But when come back at me saying that the reason I'm scummy is because I voted for Solanis at the end (When that's exactly the same thing you did.) it causes malfunctions in my logic processor.

It was not the words you said, nor the advice you gave
But it was that you were there when I needed someone to listen.

Vote Count:

AtS: 2 (Rika, Xikue)
Furien: 9 (Zynna, Dugan, Othero, Daganev, Salvation, Llandros, Shaddus, Furien, Diamondais)
Daganev: 2 (Xavius, Sarvasti)

With 19 around it's 10 to lynch.

*roll*

wut?
Did you just post to the wrong mafia thread!?!?!?!?!?!

MOD. INDUCED. TRAIN. WRECK. Solanis you are now redeemed.

(That is, game mod, not forum mod, I just realised that makes it sound like my fault)

Not really a train wreck...

A train wreck would be if you confused the two games up, not if you post in the wrong thread.

Erm, Kira, you sure you got the count right? Here's from 3 Aug:



Then:

And....

Also, Xikue changed off of me:

I think Furien is at 10 now?? Or is there an unvote I missed???

Oh, Xikue was listed on that first one. Never mind, I'm retarded! But Xikue's vote did change anyhow.

Well, ok, more of a car crash.

Sorry, last post about this just to apologize again. Fail train claims another victim.

Ok, which 6 people aren't voting at all?

The difference between forcefully aggressive and misleading is entirely in the misrepresentation of facts. Go re-read Dag's arguments. They're not even right on a superficial level.

It is weird that I didn't get the PM, and it would be great to be able to account for that. It's going to be really unfortunate if Furien turns out to be a real cult recruiter and not a mason recruiter, because that means I'm gonna die even though I was never inducted. It is true that there's no real accounting for it. That problem might have been on my end. The mod said "RP is good," right? That probably indicates very detailed PMs, for those of you who will actually be getting PMs. Furien got a very detailed PM saying that he passed his you-might-die-for-this check. There's consistency there.

As for Dag, he's thrown a few blatantly false accusations out there. "Lynch all liars?" Furien didn't lie. Furien misunderstood and corrected himself without prompting. Then there's this:


False at first glance. Furien fully explained his role and how the investigative aspect works. Furien wasn't properly accounting for timing when he said it was one of four, but that's fine too, because Furien was legitimately confused. Furien, based on his PM, said he had every reason to believe that he passed his you-might-die-for-this check. Furien doesn't know what happened. I don't know what happened. I don't have a PM. He does later express some doubt, but based on his PM, he really believes that he should have died if he targeted scum. So, what we have here from Dag is one blatant lie and two misrepresentations.

If you're voting for reasons similar to Daganev, you're wrong.

I thought we were going to give Furien three days to be able to prove or disprove himself ... did that change?

Hrm ...

Sorry, in light of recent events ... I don't feel comfortable at this point with Furien getting lynched. I refuse to let it happen today. Furien gets another day to frolic in The Sun.

Is that a power or just your wish?

I just have two questions for you.

1. Is furien a cop or an investigator?

2. Assuming everything furien is currently saying was true, would lynching him in any shape or form be "the worst mistake of our lives"?


On first glance my post may look like a miss representation,(probably because you aren't reading it properly. Each comma separates a different idea and a different line of conversation) but if you go back and read it carefully (I know, you don't like to do that when I write), there is nothing misleading about it.

What recent events?

We said we would give Furien 3 days under the assumption that people could actually verify his actions. But we can't.

Perhaps a little of both. But in any event, Furien will not get lynched today. I will use my

Gentle Spirit: Furien