http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circle

Particularly, the first sentence.

Ah, I love the collective intelligence of the internet.

Things like that worry me for this assignment I'm doing where I have to write a wikipedia article, luckily it's a subject that shouldn't get too much attention.

I remember the days when I would send people to metapedia. Good times.

I...don't see anything unusual or humorous about this article. Details can be nitpicked, but like most nitpickable details, you can see what's going on in the discussion page. Am I missing something?

It's been fixed now, but before it said that a circle has four sides and it is a retarded shape.

Nazi. I like Uncyclopedia better anyway. How to navigate :censor:'s Creek without a paddle is hilarious.

Let's try this. Alright, this works. Well, the resolution is kind of , but I can read it - grab your glasses.

I bet you Xavius was the one who fixed it

This reminds me of something my fiancé found on Wikipedia a while ago:

This is what Special:RecentChanges and huggle is for. Unfortunately it doesn't always tag all the vandalism.

I didn't go there. I just sent unsuspecting people there.

My my, Eventru! Such language!

E uses CMUD!

The average time an instance of vandalism stays up on Wikipedia is 5 minutes. If you're a Wikiholic, you make reverts often.

Also, why do you get to curse, but not me?

Gods can use any client, not like they need a combat system

Psh.. Eventru... What are you doing still using Windows Vista? Upgrade, for Christ's sake!

not until sp1

Exactly.

Then Upgrade to Ubuntu instead....

Don't necro.