Granted and agreed, but why is that making you more suspicious of him than all the other people being voted on right now?

In light of some recent posts and for whatever it might be worth. I am getting a little suspicious of Silferras. We are currently talking about having one vote on people and after 25 pages, why they have that one vote on someone, or worse not voting at all.

Three pages ago, on page 22 I switched the only vote on Kira to another and Silf calls me out on it. Accuses me of jumping on a bandwagon and then refuses to answer my questions to her about it. When Dag mentions Shiri did the same thing, she falls silent on that too.





Two days ago Silf tried to make this an issue, now others are saying some of the things I said two days ago. Fault me for being an donkey folks, I sure am that, never said I wasn't. But I want to hear what she has to say to my two above posts in quotes.

Part of it is insufficient time to dissect all the arguments, part of it is that I'm still a mafia noob, part of it is that I don't think that making mistakes qualifies as scum. In short, I'm just going with the brightest, most obvious blip on my radar. I think Shiri's third on my list.

Gah, was confusing myself with Mog and Strago. Sorry.

And isn't it obvious why I'm voting for Casilu? I'd rather give Shiri a chance to steal Aqua Rake than not.

He is currently one vote away from being lynched. If that happens, then I won't have to roleblock him!

I can roleblock someone else like... Furien or Kira.


Or I wonder if I can use my night action to spend some time with you, baby. You won't get a night action, but you won't want one.

I don't have a night action so you could say I'm available.

Sounds like you want to be the empowerer of my stunner.

There. That's my reasoning for focusing on Rika at the moment.

And feel free to roleblock me. I ain't got no night-action anyway so it'll do me no harm.

That's why I named those three secondary targets, they have no night actions normally.

Oh no. You're not allowed to roleblock me. You're way too scary. *peer*

And before you guys go crazy. That's a joke. This is a game. It's not meant to be dead serious.

There has been 5 pages of conversation since then...

I've come to believe that my roleblocking action is chloroform.

It's a "flash bulb"

I'll let you read that as dirty as you like.

But nothing to make me consider anyone more suspicious than Rika. Her behaviour seems similar to that of a scum to me. Yeah, there's many people who are off and avoidant, but she still stands out the most I feel.

You mean a trenchcoat?

Flash! A-ah! Savoir of the Mafia Game!

Your role as a female of the human species has been blocked.

@Dugan: I'll admit that I got sidetracked at the time by various things, so I'll try to address the posts you pointed out now. Irrelevant banter bits edited out.



I'm not sure what you're trying to read into my posts or what I was trying to derail - I'm not trying to pressure you into anything (especially since we know all the roles), just calling out actions I felt were backed by scummy motivations.

Action number one was keeping your vote on and gunning for Kiradawea until it was obvious no one was going to back you up, even though multiple people unvoted with the explanation that they weren't willing to risk losing Aqua Rake on Day 1 despite thinking Kiradawea suspicious. You didn't acknowledge this part at all, to my knowledge, even till now, which makes me think you want to get those votes back on her as quickly as possible by calling out your 'gut'-based suspicions but skimming over her very useful power. Remind me again, did your reasons for thinking her scummy change to anything more concrete, or were you still 'going with your gut'?

Second, maybe 'largest vote train' instead of 'largest bandwagon' would have been a better word choice on my part. Which leads us to your next post:



We (that includes me) do agree with you on her.. suspiciousness, just not with your insistence of lynching her on Day 1 (still no sign of acknowledging her non-replaceable power here - completely slipped the mind, or purposefully glossing it over?). What I object to is that you bandwagoned on the largest vote train - Shiri, at this point - without even a hint of having examined Daganev's or Casilu's arguments, with the sole reason of wanting to move on to night as soon as possible ("The day is stalling out."). Do you even think that Shiri is scum, or, as I'm seeing it, are you just trying to get someone lynched regardless of whether you think they're scummy or not? What are you trying to accomplish here?

We've had requests for a deadline, and posting speed is starting to dwindle, so I'm going to go along with that now.

Deadline is in 36 hours, and if one player has a clear plurality of the votes, that player will be lynched.