Alright, at first it was all pretty passive and decent by and large, but it's degenerated.

Let's drop the topic (before I get to gleefully ban participants for RL years while I enjoy your emotional suffering)

We gots some Hoaracle followers up ins. I don't know if I would say "lots". We defo had more Lyrethians than we had Hoaracle..ers.

EDIT: Oh jegus I was posting to be informative and you totally wrote that while I was in the process of replying please don't eat me. >.>

It... could be moderated.

That being said, if people really want to rant about lusternia then they're going to, just depends to which audience.

I saw the last post was by Eventru and thought "uh oh".

We temporarily interrupt the sudden surge of tweets to bring you:


You may now resume tweeting.

edit:

New tweets, please.

The problem with that thread is that it's a "about the person above you" thread. It would work better if people just posted noteable characters that come across their mind vOv

I was talking about the gigantic one that's mostly Llesvelt posting after everyone who posts, not the one about IC perceptions (which I agree, would be improved if you could post about anyone you wanted.)

Like how many? I don't think conversing about this will get up smacked with the banhammer, at least I hope not, this wouldn't be the bang I'd want to go out on

This is why we don't break out new threads for these things. Here, Eventru comes through, shoos us out, and things go back to normal. In its own thread, it gets locked faster and everyone goes away grumpy. It amounts to the same thing but I find myself far less grumpy about it happening like this than I do about locked threads for some reason.

Like...two.

ok Thanks!

By... Why would you delete THAT? That's just par for the course.

Well that was fun while it lasted.

Still going to give credits to whoever manages to ask Estarra when the next auction is over webcam.

Btw, tweets is great, new threads just get locked whenever we talk about...passionate topics.

I'm a fan of equal treatment for all.

If merciless person-bashing is allowed for one, it should be acceptable for everyone else (with the reverse also being true).

It should be noted that Hallifax, being the social roleplayer talkative noncombatant place that it is, has two choices facing it:

1. Not get in Serenwilde's face, upsetting members of the community that most people in Hallifax know.
2. Get in Serenwilde's face, at the tradeoff of harming an eventual exit alliance/alliance swap and potentially receiving less snark from the alliance one patiently tries to remain in.

A lot of Hallifax just digs Hoaracle, even if they didn't go as far as to join his order. Some don't want to step on that; or at least don't feel the need to.

As opposed to bans and suspensions.

Mutter.

Well it has been entertaining for a little bit. And all without naming names or being grossly insulting towards any single individual. I prefer this than reading posts from the same people that go on about cookies/stupidstuff and are so overly fascinated with themselves.

Let's just depart wholly from the topic of Hallifax's breakfast behaviour/Serenwilde's unfair self-pitying/Celest's out-of-control griefage/Glomdoring's perpetual zerg of 500 demigods/Magnagora's continued existence in the game, altogether.

(Yes, the absence of a Gaudiguch in that list was meant as a social comment. Ba-zing.)

Estarra has too many Gods.

Nerf, please.