Unknown2010-12-05 14:46:02
QUOTE (Rodngar @ Dec 5 2010, 10:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't feel like a raid is an 'in game issue'. It's almost like a glove to the cheek, in terms of org to org. They're on your property challenging you to a brawl - if you don't want to be a part of that, that isn't really an issue. Now, if you mean by issue just something going on that could be bad news, I understand THAT. I am not saying that the automatic response to raids should be to QQ - I am saying that the response to something not being fun should really be to re-evaluate why you are online right now. I'm also going to go ahead and say what I said before: if you can't deal with raiding, let the people who will/want to/can do so and then go back to your own business. That isn't 'putting it on their shoulders' - it is just realizing that there are others who are willing to do that work and you don't HAVE to.
Look at it from this point of view:
Let's say Protector X log in today and want to achieve something. Say he wants to earn some experience today to work towards circle 80. Or he's already a little burned out from defending.
So, basically, Protector X wants to play Lusternia, but he does't want to defend.
A big raid comes in. say Protector X's organisation doesn't have a combat melder online, or doesn't have the numbers.
Protector X doesn't really want to defend.
But he also doesn't really want to quit the game.
What should Protector X do?
Now, I personally don't have any issues with you guys at the moment, but I've felt a little twinge of Protector X's feelings, so I do empathize with those who are frustrated.
Kiradawea2010-12-05 14:47:29
This is gonna be a fun read when Hallifax ends up having to rebuild their shattered spheres due to overwhelming forces obliterating Continuum, because the tone WILL change.
Vadi2010-12-05 14:47:36
Seeing as the situation is helpless and there are no allies about to help assist, he does nothing. There is absolutely no need to be suicidal.
Unknown2010-12-05 14:52:51
QUOTE (Kiradawea @ Dec 5 2010, 09:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
This is gonna be a fun read when Hallifax ends up having to rebuild their shattered spheres due to overwhelming forces obliterating Continuum, because the tone WILL change.
It will be fun to see the enlightened, reasoned conversation when Researchers hopefully are as balanced as pyromancers are.
But that would require an envoy system that isn't routinely fraudulent.
Kiradawea2010-12-05 14:55:22
I thought that for the envoy system to work, you needed envoys?
Okay... a bit low perhaps, but still funny... right?
Okay... a bit low perhaps, but still funny... right?
Malicia2010-12-05 14:59:58
QUOTE (Xenthos @ Dec 5 2010, 08:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I actually have to disagree with the whole stance that you can just 'walk away' from it, actually. I'm just going to use myself as an example; I personally am not much of a combatant, I do not usually join in on the raids (unless something has just happened and we are trying to send A Message) and often leave when it's clearly overkill.
For myself, I do feel an obligation to show up when there's something going on (whether it be Glomdoring, EthGlom, or Faethorn these days). Perhaps not necessarily in terms of throwing myself at the raiders over and over, but in terms of supporting the people who I do spend most of my time with. Keep in mind that when you're raided and losing, tempers flare, frustration builds, and people do not always tend to act... rationally. Little mini drama bombs go off at random intervals and it makes a 'bad' situation worse, and I kind of feel like I am obligated to be there and try to convince people not to run off like chickens, just to get butchered and ratchet up the frustration-end more.
Beyond that, if you want to stick to your RP guns, you have to defend. You can pretend to be AFK or QQ, but that's (to me) not a really great option; I don't feel like you should address in-game issues by QQing, because you're just leaving others to pick up the pieces in your stead. While you may say that you don't have to deal with it, it's not really any more fair to push it on someone else's shoulders either.
The RP angle is easier to push aside, definitely; for me, the biggest one is in terms of the actual people involved. I do feel as if saying "But you are not FORCED" to defend is silly, because forces do exist. They may have differing strengths depending on the person and their reasons, but first and foremost this is meant to be a social game and where you have a social game you do have pressures to behave in certain ways.
Lol. I agree with Xenthos!For myself, I do feel an obligation to show up when there's something going on (whether it be Glomdoring, EthGlom, or Faethorn these days). Perhaps not necessarily in terms of throwing myself at the raiders over and over, but in terms of supporting the people who I do spend most of my time with. Keep in mind that when you're raided and losing, tempers flare, frustration builds, and people do not always tend to act... rationally. Little mini drama bombs go off at random intervals and it makes a 'bad' situation worse, and I kind of feel like I am obligated to be there and try to convince people not to run off like chickens, just to get butchered and ratchet up the frustration-end more.
Beyond that, if you want to stick to your RP guns, you have to defend. You can pretend to be AFK or QQ, but that's (to me) not a really great option; I don't feel like you should address in-game issues by QQing, because you're just leaving others to pick up the pieces in your stead. While you may say that you don't have to deal with it, it's not really any more fair to push it on someone else's shoulders either.
The RP angle is easier to push aside, definitely; for me, the biggest one is in terms of the actual people involved. I do feel as if saying "But you are not FORCED" to defend is silly, because forces do exist. They may have differing strengths depending on the person and their reasons, but first and foremost this is meant to be a social game and where you have a social game you do have pressures to behave in certain ways.
To those who are saying 'go qq or ignore raiders until they leave' I have to say 'wow'. Furien, of all people? Like a few week ago you and I had an ooc talk in tells about how Glomdoring goes overboard with the raids. You had an entirely different stance. So why the change of heart?
I'm another one of those players (like Iasmos) that would receive a lot of flak for refusing to defend and trust me, if I establish a trend of logging out when there's a raid, it will be noticed and thrown in my face at some point. I'd rather not lose the faith of the friends and players I associate with in Celest. There is a sense of obligation that comes with the position you're in. That said, I also enjoy raiding and being raided because I think its fun. I will back off when it's too much though.
Unknown2010-12-05 15:01:56
QUOTE (Kiradawea @ Dec 5 2010, 10:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I thought that for the envoy system to work, you needed envoys?
Okay... a bit low perhaps, but still funny... right?
Okay... a bit low perhaps, but still funny... right?
Yeah, in a hysterical manner, yes, kinda funny.
Rodngar2010-12-05 15:07:41
QUOTE (Kiradawea @ Dec 5 2010, 09:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
This is gonna be a fun read when Hallifax ends up having to rebuild their shattered spheres due to overwhelming forces obliterating Continuum, because the tone WILL change.
I will never change my stance on the fact that if it isn't fun, I will log off or do something else to make it be fun - and that is, ultimately, what this is actually about.
QUOTE
It will be fun to see the enlightened, reasoned conversation when Researchers hopefully are as balanced as pyromancers are.
But that would require an envoy system that isn't routinely fraudulent.
But that would require an envoy system that isn't routinely fraudulent.
That is a completely different topic - as well, why are you comparing two completely different archetypes? The Pyromancers having nothing good about them is 100% about having no actual envoy (Lyria doesn't count, though bless her for trying), and no ACTIVE envoy when the special report rolled around. You know as well as I that we would have seen a wildly different result if two active people had worked on that process instead of one. As well, if you feel so strong about it, why not urge a special report to be held to help Pyromancy? You can add the tag of 'we can fix what you honestly think is broken, so long as you are willing to make the demesne cohesive and viable'.
Unknown2010-12-05 15:09:49
QUOTE (Kiradawea @ Dec 5 2010, 09:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I thought that for the envoy system to work, you needed envoys?
Okay... a bit low perhaps, but still funny... right?
Okay... a bit low perhaps, but still funny... right?
Now that I'm back to my old knighty ways and in Celest, which, despite its prior reputation, I am finding helpful, enjoyable, and fun? Yes, that made me giggle.
I mean, sure, the whole argument of "you didn't have an envoy to stop the skillset from being destroyed" is sort of like, "you weren't home to stop me, so I burnt your house down. Your bad!"
But, no longer my problem. I'm more likely to be fighting pyros than fighting with them in the current climate. It still strikes me as a shame however.
QUOTE (Malicia @ Dec 5 2010, 09:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Lol. I agree with Xenthos!
To those who are saying 'go qq or ignore raiders until they leave' I have to say 'wow'. Furien, of all people? Like a few week ago you and I had an ooc talk in tells about how Glomdoring goes overboard with the raids. You had an entirely different stance. So why the change of heart?
To those who are saying 'go qq or ignore raiders until they leave' I have to say 'wow'. Furien, of all people? Like a few week ago you and I had an ooc talk in tells about how Glomdoring goes overboard with the raids. You had an entirely different stance. So why the change of heart?
They jumped on to a winning team and are enjoying routinely steping on outgunned and outmanned semi-combatants, naturally!
QUOTE
I'm another one of those players (like Iasmos) that would receive a lot of flak for refusing to defend and trust me, if I establish a trend of logging out when there's a raid, it will be noticed and thrown in my face at some point. I'd rather not lose the faith of the friends and players I associate with in Celest. There is a sense of obligation that comes with the position you're in. That said, I also enjoy raiding and being raided because I think its fun. I will back off when it's too much though.
I will forever be impressed with the people who will walk, relatively uncomplaining, in to a routine deathtrap. Perhaps because I start off on the edge of raging some days, and generally go down hill as I get more fatigued. Then again, I never actually do anything drastic when I'm flipped out either.
Rodngar2010-12-05 15:12:34
QUOTE (Rainydays @ Dec 5 2010, 10:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
They jumped on to a winning team and are enjoying routinely steping on outgunned and outmanned semi-combatants, naturally!
I believe this is an unfair representation of anybody in Hallifax. In the end, I believe any of us are just, for once, looking for the refreshing instance of actually not only being the aggressor, but having a cohesive team with which to engage in combat alongside. I will tell you that it isn't killing the under-staffed Gaudiguch citizens that makes me enjoy the raids in the past two weeks, but the fact that, for once, I'm actually getting to fight.
EDIT: I joined Hallifax so I could be in a stable city that Aoife had interest in (since she insisted on being in the same citizenship org) that had a reputation for keeping what drama it might have off of CT or the boards. Oh, and I really liked Researcher RP and themes in their skills.
Furien2010-12-05 15:14:33
QUOTE (Malicia @ Dec 5 2010, 06:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
To those who are saying 'go qq or ignore raiders until they leave' I have to say 'wow'. Furien, of all people? Like a few week ago you and I had an ooc talk in tells about how Glomdoring goes overboard with the raids. You had an entirely different stance. So why the change of heart?
I'm not meaning to advocate logging out. Depending on the situation, you just can't feasibly eject the attackers from your territory. Then your hands are just tied and your best option is to act to preserve your organization's morale by not charging to your death. Logging out only becomes an 'option' when you're dealing with an atmosphere so drenched in constant conflict that it becomes a 'toxic atmosphere', and we all know the kinds of attention that draws. Even back during our discussion, I was so frustrated that I really felt like just QQing and taking a break in the aftermath of the raid. There was nothing I could do to make the outcome any different, as much as people would have liked me to. What can you do, then? Soldier on, the the 972nd time, knowing that things may very well never change?
As for the raids; Glomdoring still goes overboard with the raids at times, I've seen the same a few times with Hallifax. I figure I'll be abstaining from any real 'raiding' for a few days since Caerulo and others have spoken up.
Edit: Akui? Really? You're in no position to say why I do what I do. I haven't touched Gaudiguch in three or four months, as far as playing in the organization goes.
Unknown2010-12-05 15:15:09
QUOTE (Rodngar @ Dec 5 2010, 10:07 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That is a completely different topic - as well, why are you comparing two completely different archetypes? The Pyromancers having nothing good about them is 100% about having no actual envoy (Lyria doesn't count, though bless her for trying), and no ACTIVE envoy when the special report rolled around. You know as well as I that we would have seen a wildly different result if two active people had worked on that process instead of one. As well, if you feel so strong about it, why not urge a special report to be held to help Pyromancy? You can add the tag of 'we can fix what you honestly think is broken, so long as you are willing to make the demesne cohesive and viable'.
I did that. I petitioned and discussed that with Sior a few months back. They said no. Eventually, I decided that the skillset is unsalvagable without a major rework. It wouldn't even be necessary, if it hadn't been dismantled via envoy war by liars. But you know this, since you were in the damn guild at the time.
That said, researchers have probably blasted more people with broken damange than pyros managed when they were at their peak, at this point. Thus, if pyros deserved what they got, researchers certainly deserve a heafty 'reworking' in the name of balance.
Ushaara2010-12-05 15:15:51
I think having someone to find a silver lining no matter what the result, and patient enough to give direction/help to total combat newbies is hugely important to mitigating how badly the effects of a raid are felt/taken.
I know having people in Hallifax saying things like, "Ok we died a lot, but well done for doing X, we need to be better at doing Y, and Z is how we're going to do it. Let's remember that for next time." and a lot of other small steps were a big factor in encouaging me to get more involved with combat, and for changing the city from being the 'raidee' to becoming the 'raider'.
Kick-and-run raids are a different kettle of fish then of course, but in all the raids I've been on with Hallifax, we have gone with the intention to stay and fight. (aside from that one quick one where we needed a Fire Lord to get our arena)
Positive thoughts, positive action, positive results, people!
I know having people in Hallifax saying things like, "Ok we died a lot, but well done for doing X, we need to be better at doing Y, and Z is how we're going to do it. Let's remember that for next time." and a lot of other small steps were a big factor in encouaging me to get more involved with combat, and for changing the city from being the 'raidee' to becoming the 'raider'.
Kick-and-run raids are a different kettle of fish then of course, but in all the raids I've been on with Hallifax, we have gone with the intention to stay and fight. (aside from that one quick one where we needed a Fire Lord to get our arena)
Positive thoughts, positive action, positive results, people!
Kiradawea2010-12-05 15:17:39
Gallows humour is my speciality. It is the only humour I can get to function.
Rodngar2010-12-05 15:20:49
QUOTE (Rainydays @ Dec 5 2010, 10:15 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I did that. I petitioned and discussed that with Sior a few months back. It wouldn't even be necessary, if it hadn't been dismantled via envoy war by liars. But you know this, since you were in the damn guild at the time.
That said, researchers have probably blasted more people with broken damange than pyros managed when they were at their peak, at this point. Thus, if pyros deserved what they got, researchers certainly deserve a heafty 'reworking' in the name of balance.
That said, researchers have probably blasted more people with broken damange than pyros managed when they were at their peak, at this point. Thus, if pyros deserved what they got, researchers certainly deserve a heafty 'reworking' in the name of balance.
Except eye for an eye is a completely unjustifiable method of balancing, and I believe that Researcher 'damage' is actually just their obvious schtick at work (that is, being the Damage Guardianâ„¢) - since Timequake is laughably impractical unless under incredibly specific conditions that make the skill essentially a 'I win even MORE' taunt ability. What you are very likely seeing is Researcher crowds (2 - 4 Researchers in a group) all spamming Balestone - a room-wide, enemy-list based attack that scales off of INT, costs 2p + 1 beryl/garnet, and costs balance. It is essentially a Guardian Boulderblast/Hailstorm/Tempest?/Fireblast. In a team were a Mage is assured (raiding without a melder is not only unwise, but improbable as Shamarah is usually our way up, and Ridley is with us too), it is essentially doubling the number of Hailstorm-esque skills we have.
If you believe it should be retooled to be single target, do less damage, cost more power, etc.. well, talk to your envoy. I will admit that I am feeling sketchy on precisely how balanced it is, but I do not believe it is gamebreaking - just very 'loud' about how well it works in the only combat that occurs in Lusternia (that is, team PK).
Unknown2010-12-05 15:20:55
QUOTE (Furien @ Dec 5 2010, 10:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm not meaning to advocate logging out. Depending on the situation, you just can't feasibly eject the attackers from your territory. Then your hands are just tied and your best option is to act to preserve your organization's morale by not charging to your death. Logging out only becomes an 'option' when you're dealing with an atmosphere so drenched in constant conflict that it becomes a 'toxic atmosphere', and we all know the kinds of attention that draws. Even back during our discussion, I was so frustrated that I really felt like just QQing and taking a break in the aftermath of the raid. There was nothing I could do to make the outcome any different, as much as people would have liked me to. What can you do, then? Soldier on, the the 972nd time, knowing that things may very well never change?
As for the raids; Glomdoring still goes overboard with the raids at times, I've seen the same a few times with Hallifax. I figure I'll be abstaining from any real 'raiding' for a few days since Caerulo and others have spoken up.
As for the raids; Glomdoring still goes overboard with the raids at times, I've seen the same a few times with Hallifax. I figure I'll be abstaining from any real 'raiding' for a few days since Caerulo and others have spoken up.
On average, give me mag raids any day. I know they can go overbroard too, but it doesn't seem to be quite as often. I'm sure that's a function of circumstance more than playerbase.
QUOTE
Edit: Akui? Really? You're in no position to say why I do what I do. I haven't touched Gaudiguch in three or four months, as far as playing in the organization goes.
Regardless of who they are, I have expressed, and will continue to express the same general sentiment towards anyone in a winning org who seems to be on the side of "yes, we're smashing the same four people in to the ground every night, but I want to do it HARDER." My snide angst does not see in terms of org colour.
Furien2010-12-05 15:25:52
QUOTE (Rainydays @ Dec 5 2010, 07:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Regardless of who they are, I have expressed, and will continue to express the same general sentiment towards anyone in a winning org who seems to be on the side of "yes, we're smashing the same four people in to the ground every night, but I want to do it HARDER." My snide angst does not see in terms of org colour.
You're also the same person who has stepped out when offered the opportunity to stand up to the E-Thugs of certain organizations, though. I don't think either of us has room to judge.
Edit (entirely unrelated to the above): It seems I am unable to start a new character for fun without someone in my prior organization being upset that I'm not chaining myself down to Alianna. This is getting ridiculous. I mention this because the notion of 'raid grief' ties heavily into it.
Unknown2010-12-05 15:25:55
@Furien: For me though, the frustration stems more from us rather than you though. If Gaudiguch could somehow muster a feasible group of defenders who know what they're doing and are able to lead those who don't, I'm pretty sure that the raiding and defending would be much more enjoyable.
Unknown2010-12-05 15:27:05
QUOTE (Rodngar @ Dec 5 2010, 10:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If you believe it should be retooled to be single target, do less damage, cost more power, etc.. well, talk to your envoy. I will admit that I am feeling sketchy on precisely how balanced it is, but I do not believe it is gamebreaking - just very 'loud' about how well it works in the only combat that occurs in Lusternia (that is, team PK).
When I log in tonight, you should arena with me, and you can show me what your damage is against a target who is probably better equipped to receive raw damage than most.
If you flatten me with it, something is very wrong.
Rodngar2010-12-05 15:27:55
QUOTE (Rainydays @ Dec 5 2010, 10:27 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
When I log in tonight, you should arena with me, and you can show me what your damage is against a target who is probably better equipped to receive raw damage than most.
If you flatten me with it, something is very wrong.
If you flatten me with it, something is very wrong.
Deal. Drop me a tell when you log on.