Unknown2011-07-19 06:39:27
Three in the Morning (RJ's I Can Barely Sleep In This Casino Remix) is fantastic at helping me get to sleep. It is soothing.
Unknown2011-07-19 17:15:41
THE BATTERWITCH IS ONE OF THE ROBO ARADIAS
No probably not I just felt like throwing out a bit of unfounded and wild speculation.
THE BATTERWITCH IS NANNASPRITE
No probably not I just felt like throwing out a bit of unfounded and wild speculation.
THE BATTERWITCH IS NANNASPRITE
Lehki2011-07-19 17:32:29
QUOTE (Phoebus @ Jul 19 2011, 01:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
THE BATTERWITCH IS ONE OF THE ROBO ARADIAS
No probably not I just felt like throwing out a bit of unfounded and wild speculation.
THE BATTERWITCH IS NANNASPRITE
No probably not I just felt like throwing out a bit of unfounded and wild speculation.
THE BATTERWITCH IS NANNASPRITE
AN ARADIA BOT THAT IS POSSESED BY NANNASPRITE.
Unknown2011-07-19 18:55:29
QUOTE (Lehki @ Jul 19 2011, 01:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
AN ARADIA BOT THAT IS POSSESED BY NANNASPRITE.
BRILLIANT
SOMEONE GIVE THIS MAN A MEDAL
also THE BATTERWITCH IS VRISKA AND JOHN'S GHOST BABY
Lehki2011-07-24 03:45:07
It just occurred to me that with the latest photo scraps page, he's probably trolling us. Probably not going to see those other things and will just continue with the memo.
Not that memos aren't the best, though. Especially once FCG1-4 gets in there.
Not that memos aren't the best, though. Especially once FCG1-4 gets in there.
Unknown2011-07-24 06:22:25
Man, the Tavros/Gamzee shippers are probably having a field day with this one. And here I was hoping it would be a log that would shut them down completelhaaaaahahaha who am I kidding even if it was a log of WE WILL NEVER BE ANYTHING they would cling to it as proof of their love.
Goddamn shippers.
Goddamn shippers.
Lilia2011-07-24 06:40:12
I was glad to see such rampant silliness again, though. The 'sick burns' are just hilarious.
Lehki2011-07-24 08:23:47
Oh my god.
Oh mY MoThErF***InG GoD.
Oh mY MoThErF***InG GoD.
Unknown2011-07-24 14:38:33
QUOTE (Phoebus @ Jul 24 2011, 01:22 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Man, the Tavros/Gamzee shippers are probably having a field day with this one. And here I was hoping it would be a log that would shut them down completelhaaaaahahaha who am I kidding even if it was a log of WE WILL NEVER BE ANYTHING they would cling to it as proof of their love.
Goddamn shippers.
Goddamn shippers.
Such is the mindset of Shippers. You can never destroy their hopes and dreams of their shippings.
Llesvelt2011-07-24 16:29:09
Nannaquin/Hat
<3
<3
Ilyssa2011-07-24 16:30:36
QUOTE (Lilia @ Jul 24 2011, 02:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I was glad to see such rampant silliness again, though. The 'sick burns' are just hilarious.
It made me miss chill Gamzee and Tavros.
Unknown2011-07-24 18:33:07
You can call me Iceberg. 'cause I'ma sink dat ship. ps. they're dead
Ilyssa2011-07-24 19:30:33
Unknown2011-08-04 21:49:39
Rereading old logs, and realizing that in this particular one, Doc Scratch reminds me of Elostian, what with the QUESTIONS ALWAYS.
QUOTE
TT: How can I see through it?
It seems you weren't listening, so I will state this again in the form of a question.
Don't you think I should be asking the questions from now on?
TT: Yes, if you wanted to be disingenuous and irritating.
Don't you think a clever person should be able to acquire information from someone who only asks questions?
TT: Then it's a challenge!
TT: I pass.
Do you have a choice? What if I'm feeling a bit stubborn?
TT: Ok, so what you mean is I should continue humoring your leading questions until you happen to ask certain rhetorical questions that contain information I need.
Was that a question?
TT: That was a fact, and then a period.
How does a Seer see?
TT: ...
TT: With a crystal ball?
TT: I already considered that. I don't think I can get the focus of the ball to "zoom in" tight enough on the cue ball's enclosure to read the answers.
How else does she see?
TT: By other magical means, I guess.
TT: Should I use magic?
Do you believe in magic?
TT: Magic is real.
TT: I've been using it.
Are you sure?
TT: Use whatever word you want to describe it. I have magic wands, they are very powerful, and they allow me to be magic. Your questions are silly.
What makes you convinced the wands are responsible for your abilities?
TT: Because I did not have the abilities before I made them.
Could this be circumstantial?
TT: Could it?
Is there an echo?
TT: Is there an echo?
Hee hee?
TT: I don't know what you're getting at.
TT: How about another leading question?
What did you combine to make those wands?
TT: Some stuff.
Knitting needles?
An inexpensive figurine of some fictional fellow with long whiskers?
A simple textbook on the zoologically dubious?
Why would this mundane combination of objects grant a child such an alarming mastery over dark forces all at once?
TT: I'm guessing this is one of the rhetorical questions meant to be informative.
TT: So then, my answer should affirm how ridiculous that sounds, shouldn't it?
Maybe?
TT: That wasn't even a question.
Yes it was?
TT: Ok. Magic is fake, the wands are useless toys, and there is something else going on. Next question???
Would it be so difficult to believe the power you've found to devastate your planet and create shortcuts through your session is not entirely by your own device?
Would it be so difficult to believe a young lady could be unwittingly apprenticed by more powerful entities who meant her potential to be realized later through some arbitrary trigger?
What would you say if I said a dutiful girl raised in the daylight was protected by a bulb-headed guardian, and learned to glow in the dark after death?
What would you say if I said a vengeful boy on a path of nihilism was taken under the wings of fearsome angels, and learned to destroy hope with their light?
What would you say if I said a reserved girl enamored by what dwelt in shadow was selected by the horrorterrors for service, and did their bidding at every step while convinced of her own autonomy?
TT: What would I say to those short fables?
TT: Not much, except I gather the third is a story about me, and that there's a lesson you'd like me to take from it.
TT: That I should renounce my "allegiance" before my grimdark corruption is absolute.
TT: And while I'm at it, I should discard these useless wands, because apparently the power was in my little black heart all along. Is that right?
Won't you have to give up your specibus to the one who causes the Scratch regardless?
How else will the young man wield that great big needle?
TT: I don't know! If you say so.
Haven't your friends already shown concern for your recklessness and your increasing sense of detachment from the party, the team objectives, and not to mention those of your personal quest?
Does this worry you? Is there a part of you left that's able to worry?
TT: Yes. It has been mysteriously localized to my middle finger. Could the dark magics be at work AGAIN?!
Do you deny that you have been neglecting incoming messages from your teammates? Would that be in keeping with the spirit of the human emotion of friendship for one whose soul was not so befouled by the designs of unknowable monstrosities?
TT: Friendship isn't an emotion, numbnuts.
Isn't it, Rose?
Isn't it?
TT: I've been busy. I'll get back to them.
TT: And can we please stop doing the patronizing question thing?
TT: In exchange I promise I will discontinue my patronizing responses.
Can the omniscient be patronized?
TT: The omniscipotent can do whatever they please. I guess I'm just asking you nicely to do me this favor.
It seems you weren't listening, so I will state this again in the form of a question.
Don't you think I should be asking the questions from now on?
TT: Yes, if you wanted to be disingenuous and irritating.
Don't you think a clever person should be able to acquire information from someone who only asks questions?
TT: Then it's a challenge!
TT: I pass.
Do you have a choice? What if I'm feeling a bit stubborn?
TT: Ok, so what you mean is I should continue humoring your leading questions until you happen to ask certain rhetorical questions that contain information I need.
Was that a question?
TT: That was a fact, and then a period.
How does a Seer see?
TT: ...
TT: With a crystal ball?
TT: I already considered that. I don't think I can get the focus of the ball to "zoom in" tight enough on the cue ball's enclosure to read the answers.
How else does she see?
TT: By other magical means, I guess.
TT: Should I use magic?
Do you believe in magic?
TT: Magic is real.
TT: I've been using it.
Are you sure?
TT: Use whatever word you want to describe it. I have magic wands, they are very powerful, and they allow me to be magic. Your questions are silly.
What makes you convinced the wands are responsible for your abilities?
TT: Because I did not have the abilities before I made them.
Could this be circumstantial?
TT: Could it?
Is there an echo?
TT: Is there an echo?
Hee hee?
TT: I don't know what you're getting at.
TT: How about another leading question?
What did you combine to make those wands?
TT: Some stuff.
Knitting needles?
An inexpensive figurine of some fictional fellow with long whiskers?
A simple textbook on the zoologically dubious?
Why would this mundane combination of objects grant a child such an alarming mastery over dark forces all at once?
TT: I'm guessing this is one of the rhetorical questions meant to be informative.
TT: So then, my answer should affirm how ridiculous that sounds, shouldn't it?
Maybe?
TT: That wasn't even a question.
Yes it was?
TT: Ok. Magic is fake, the wands are useless toys, and there is something else going on. Next question???
Would it be so difficult to believe the power you've found to devastate your planet and create shortcuts through your session is not entirely by your own device?
Would it be so difficult to believe a young lady could be unwittingly apprenticed by more powerful entities who meant her potential to be realized later through some arbitrary trigger?
What would you say if I said a dutiful girl raised in the daylight was protected by a bulb-headed guardian, and learned to glow in the dark after death?
What would you say if I said a vengeful boy on a path of nihilism was taken under the wings of fearsome angels, and learned to destroy hope with their light?
What would you say if I said a reserved girl enamored by what dwelt in shadow was selected by the horrorterrors for service, and did their bidding at every step while convinced of her own autonomy?
TT: What would I say to those short fables?
TT: Not much, except I gather the third is a story about me, and that there's a lesson you'd like me to take from it.
TT: That I should renounce my "allegiance" before my grimdark corruption is absolute.
TT: And while I'm at it, I should discard these useless wands, because apparently the power was in my little black heart all along. Is that right?
Won't you have to give up your specibus to the one who causes the Scratch regardless?
How else will the young man wield that great big needle?
TT: I don't know! If you say so.
Haven't your friends already shown concern for your recklessness and your increasing sense of detachment from the party, the team objectives, and not to mention those of your personal quest?
Does this worry you? Is there a part of you left that's able to worry?
TT: Yes. It has been mysteriously localized to my middle finger. Could the dark magics be at work AGAIN?!
Do you deny that you have been neglecting incoming messages from your teammates? Would that be in keeping with the spirit of the human emotion of friendship for one whose soul was not so befouled by the designs of unknowable monstrosities?
TT: Friendship isn't an emotion, numbnuts.
Isn't it, Rose?
Isn't it?
TT: I've been busy. I'll get back to them.
TT: And can we please stop doing the patronizing question thing?
TT: In exchange I promise I will discontinue my patronizing responses.
Can the omniscient be patronized?
TT: The omniscipotent can do whatever they please. I guess I'm just asking you nicely to do me this favor.
Unknown2011-08-06 14:58:29
What.
Lehki2011-08-06 17:31:00
So, wait... Gamzee... did... what? o_o
Lilia2011-08-06 17:44:10
Yeah, that whole sequence was hard to understand.
Lehki2011-08-06 18:37:13
Best I can guess... Gamzee has some latent psychic powers we never saw before, and used them to make everybody subconsciously crazy? Which manifested as that creepy jester doll in John's dreams?
Also omg wtf the batter witch gave Dave the link for the ICP video.
EDIT: WAIT!
motherf'in
WAIT
Does... does that mean... Gamzee made Dream Cal?
Also omg wtf the batter witch gave Dave the link for the ICP video.
EDIT: WAIT!
motherf'in
WAIT
QUOTE
TC: as if i'd forget to do my chucklevoodoos to you too.
TC: TO
UP YOUR DREAMS.
TC: make your worst fears come alive and get up on their haunts in your naphappy pan.
TG: what
TG: what fears
TC: YOU MOTHER KNOW, BROTHER.
TC: its the puppet.
TC: TO
UP YOUR DREAMS. TC: make your worst fears come alive and get up on their haunts in your naphappy pan.
TG: what
TG: what fears
TC: YOU MOTHER
KNOW, BROTHER. TC: its the
puppet.Does... does that mean... Gamzee made Dream Cal?
Lilia2011-08-06 19:51:16
QUOTE (Lehki @ Aug 6 2011, 01:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Does... does that mean... Gamzee made Dream Cal?
I think so, isn't that Cal's eye floating in his iris? There was a jester head in his eyes when he made the Jack doll.
Unknown2011-08-06 20:17:13
I think Gamzee might be using his Bard of Rage powers to manifest terrible things. And he brought Cal to life apparently ohhh noooo. Also does this make Dave <> Gamzee since talking to Dave made him less angry this time? Less angry but still murderous. Haha god I don't know, I'm just trying to stay one step ahead of the shippers so I know in advance what to facepalm at.
