Shaddus2008-12-26 16:02:50
QUOTE
karma consider "random seal" "person"
It will cost you 5 karma to curse "person"
It will cost "person" 100 karma to lift that curse.
It will cost you 5 karma to curse "person"
It will cost "person" 100 karma to lift that curse.
I wonder if this person is a griefer
Kiradawea2008-12-26 16:21:05
Either that, or they've gone a little overboard in fixing the worthlessness of the karmic curses. A little.
Unknown2008-12-26 17:50:29
QUOTE (Kiradawea @ Dec 26 2008, 11:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Either that, or they've gone a little overboard in fixing the worthlessness of the karmic curses. A little.
not really, I karma considered a curse.
it would cost me 65 karma to actually curse
only 35 to remove it
>_> worthless, waste of karma
Kiradawea2008-12-26 18:21:33
It was meant as a joke on how worthless karma curses are due to their immense cost for the curser.
Unknown2008-12-27 01:01:12
QUOTE
For a fleeting moment, dear Blacktalon, my emotions took control of my
usual demeanor. My frivolous, untamed addiction to alcohol regrettably
corrupted the sanctity of a liturgy for our Great Spirits. This I now
know. Keeper, I am sorry for my juvenile disrespect.
Yes, what I did was completely uncalled for. I made a mockery of this,
our Blacktalon, and the Glomdoring itself - an unforgiveable cause for
unto which I boldly seek forgiveness.
By my oath, from the darkest corners of my heart, Blacktalon, hear me:
this incident is entirely my fault, and I am deeply sorry.
usual demeanor. My frivolous, untamed addiction to alcohol regrettably
corrupted the sanctity of a liturgy for our Great Spirits. This I now
know. Keeper, I am sorry for my juvenile disrespect.
Yes, what I did was completely uncalled for. I made a mockery of this,
our Blacktalon, and the Glomdoring itself - an unforgiveable cause for
unto which I boldly seek forgiveness.
By my oath, from the darkest corners of my heart, Blacktalon, hear me:
this incident is entirely my fault, and I am deeply sorry.
Exeryte - pure win.
Unknown2008-12-27 01:14:13
I think we know who's going to win the next Beauty Challenge...
QUOTE
Celina says, "This dress is woven from love and hugs. Bright rainbow sparkles spell out "I <3 Estarra" in florescent pinks, greens, and yellows. On the back, "Spiritsingers aren't OP" is stitched into the
snuggly fabric in bright pink fur."
snuggly fabric in bright pink fur."
Celina2008-12-27 01:26:15
Who needs creativity when you can appeal to the judges?
Also:
(Jhagar): Silvanus says, "Beastiality ain't bad, it just has to be done right."
Also:
(Jhagar): Silvanus says, "Beastiality ain't bad, it just has to be done right."
Arix2008-12-27 01:40:56
Spiritsingers AREN'T that OP. If you lose to one, you just suck at combat and should get a system.
Celina2008-12-27 01:43:34
QUOTE (Arix @ Dec 26 2008, 08:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Spiritsingers AREN'T that OP. If you lose to one, you just suck at combat and should get a system.
Wrong thread, sugar buns.
Arix2008-12-27 01:50:42
Oh I'm not ranting. That's the standard response to ' is OP, nerf PLZ', unless it was changed.
Unknown2008-12-27 01:57:53
QUOTE (Arix @ Dec 26 2008, 08:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Oh I'm not ranting. That's the standard response to ' is OP, nerf PLZ', unless it was changed.
It has. The updated response is: But we Envoyed that, it's fine!
Krellan2008-12-27 02:49:58
QUOTE (Salvation @ Dec 26 2008, 07:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Exeryte - pure win.
If I don't get into BT now and kicked out of glom cause you posted this too early...
Reiha2008-12-27 03:18:35
(*): Urazial says, "Aw. Rika at the Master Tree making a frowny face. Getting emo already!"
Unknown2008-12-27 03:44:05
QUOTE (Krellan @ Dec 26 2008, 09:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If I don't get into BT now and kicked out of glom cause you posted this too early...
That would be a clear case of taking OOC IC and you could just issue, as 1) the three words aren't even an insult in the Lusternian world and (more importantly) 2) there is no way to prove it was done intentionally ICly.
Urazial2008-12-27 03:50:10
And now, unfortunately, no one can really object to the letter or it could be viewed as taking OOC info IC. Not that I think there would be any problem with it to begin with, but it does kind of put a kind of insurance on it by posting it on the forums, hmm?
Unknown2008-12-27 03:54:38
Psh, it would not have been plausible IC in any case - no proof of intent.
Xenthos2008-12-27 04:33:40
QUOTE (Salvation @ Dec 26 2008, 10:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Psh, it would not have been plausible IC in any case - no proof of intent.
In terms of in-game decision-making (there is no "innocent until proven guilty" law), just the fact that it actually spells that out is pretty clear intent. The odds of it happening that way by accident are almost zero.
That said, I didn't notice it when I read it in-game, so... as I wouldn't have re-read it to look for anything without some of the various OOC comments made about it, it's pretty much just going to be ignored unless someone else brings it up.
It's probably for the best that it be left ignored.
Arix2008-12-27 04:34:31
That, and outside of divine intervention, there is no way to prove who wrote a particular letter
Unknown2008-12-27 04:38:02
You swing Xos, Fang of the Lioness at a huge, black-skinned hammerhead shark.
You cut him with a light wound.
You have scored a WORLD-SHATTERING CRITICAL HIT!!!
And it didn't even put him into deep lacerations! There was another shark in the room too, I was suddenly glad to be orclach.
Xenthos2008-12-27 05:02:14
QUOTE (Arix @ Dec 26 2008, 11:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That, and outside of divine intervention, there is no way to prove who wrote a particular letter
... he posted it to Glomdoring news.
There is a name attached.
Both at the front and at the end.
