Yet Another Religion Thread

by Unknown

Back to The Real World.

Unknown2009-03-24 06:21:42
So far, everyone seems very atheistic. Only Casilu, Shuyin and I have a score above zero.
Xavius2009-03-24 06:33:24
Must not respond. Muuuuust not respond. Bed is better than forums.
Unknown2009-03-24 09:21:20
Seriously, does Lusternia attract atheists?
Unknown2009-03-24 12:19:40
QUOTE (Kiriwe y'Kaliath @ Mar 24 2009, 05:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I wouldn't be surprised, but then I think most gamers are atheists, but that's personal bias.

As a Hedonist, I'm all about only doing what's fun for me. God does not factor into fun, cuz He says not to do lots of fun things XD

Why would most gamers be atheists? I'm curious as to how you got to that conclusion.
Furien2009-03-24 12:23:10
Lazy apathetic prone to easy pleasure good-for-nothings that'll burn in hell, that's why!

(I think you may very well get Xavius started after that comment though, hmm)
Shiri2009-03-24 12:31:34
For starters we're principally modern young people. And we have a significant non-American playerbase, but we all speak English. Xavius might have something else in mind, but if we did have a high incidence of atheists (which I'm not sure about) that'd probably be part of why.
Vhaas2009-03-24 12:35:10
QUOTE (Shiri @ Mar 24 2009, 12:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
For starters we're principally modern young people. And we have a significant non-American playerbase, but we all speak English. Xavius might have something else in mind, but if we did have a high incidence of atheists (which I'm not sure about) that'd probably be part of why.


Your take on the relation between young people and atheism?
Shiri2009-03-24 12:36:56
QUOTE (Vhaas @ Mar 24 2009, 12:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Your take on the relation between young people and atheism?

Positive correlation. In England, anyway. I would imagine it's the same in other countries but that's a risky assumption to make.
Unknown2009-03-24 14:26:01
QUOTE (Navaryn @ Mar 24 2009, 10:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
GOD IS DEAD! ninja.gif

Comments like this are rather offensive. I don't mind atheists, unless they are rabid atheists (that would be due to their extremism, not their belief. I am a rather open-minded Christian (gasp!), and I don't judge people by their faith). I've also got a rather broad sense of humour, but this is not funny, if you intended it as a joke.
Unknown2009-03-24 14:29:22
QUOTE (Caerulo @ Mar 24 2009, 10:26 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Comments like this are rather offensive. I don't mind atheists, unless they are rabid atheists (that would be due to their extremism, not their belief. I am a rather open-minded Christian (gasp!), and I don't judge people by their faith). I've also got a rather broad sense of humour, but this is not funny, if you intended it as a joke.


http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nietzsche/
Caffrey2009-03-24 14:35:10
That is a quote from Nietzsche I believe, he does not mean physically dead. But rather that "God" as an idea is no longer capable of acting as a wellspring for moral code in modern thinking. Nihilism and Existentialism rose from that premise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_is_dead
Unknown2009-03-24 14:35:34
QUOTE (Salvation @ Mar 24 2009, 10:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

doh.gif I am thoroughly ashamed. Oh well.

Edit: I also need to apologise to Navaryn. So sorry for misunderstanding you. dazed.gif Goes to show how much I actually know about philosophy.
Shiri2009-03-24 14:41:19
Not that it would be legitimately offensive even if it weren't obviously a Nietzsche reference...
Unknown2009-03-24 14:43:04
QUOTE (Shiri @ Mar 24 2009, 10:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Not that it would be legitimately offensive even if it weren't obviously a Nietzsche reference...

Rub it in some more, will you? sad.gif

Edit: Yeah, I don't know much about philosophy. Can't seem to gather any interest to read them.
Shiri2009-03-24 14:45:26
QUOTE (Caerulo @ Mar 24 2009, 02:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Rub it in some more, will you? sad.gif

I don't mean to, actually. It's more that even the meaning that wasn't from that (which I can't blame you for not knowing) doesn't seem like it ought to be offensive, so I think you got a weird interpretation like "and Christianity should be" out of it.

EDIT: Oh, and we should put the religious discussion in another thread, as usual, before it becomes a topic-eating cancer.
Unknown2009-03-24 14:48:30
QUOTE (Shiri @ Mar 24 2009, 10:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't mean to, actually. It's more that even the meaning that wasn't from that (which I can't blame you for not knowing) doesn't seem like it ought to be offensive, so I think you got a weird interpretation like "and Christianity should be" out of it.

EDIT: Oh, and we should put the religious discussion in another thread, as usual, before it becomes a topic-eating cancer.

Yeah, I saw that he placed it right after the Divine Command 0%, and assumed that he was referring to all the talk about the large number of non-religious people.
Xavius2009-03-24 16:17:56
QUOTE (Caerulo @ Mar 24 2009, 09:26 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Comments like this are rather offensive. I don't mind atheists, unless they are rabid atheists (that would be due to their extremism, not their belief. I am a rather open-minded Christian (gasp!), and I don't judge people by their faith). I've also got a rather broad sense of humour, but this is not funny, if you intended it as a joke.

Man, if that's offensive to you, Imma go track down Verithrax. He might not worry enough about careful observation and exposition, but he'll flame the Christian right out of you.

Anyways, Shiri pretty much hit the nail on the head as to why divine command is such a ridiculous proposition here. Even if you do believe in a god, most of us have been taught from an early age not to believe everything you read, see on TV, hear from the stranger in the costume, etc. The primary determinates of ethics in this group are 1) a personal philosophy based in some fashion on growth, avoidance of pain, pursuit of pleasure, and justice, and 2) human law when subject to review and modification to be in line with point 1. The modern influence of divine command is pretty overtly evil. Religion serves little purpose in modern society beyond segregation and denial of universal human rights, seeing as how we all agree on the meaningful parts of what the ancients wrote down without needing to be reminded that even the practitioners of genocide thought that murdering people off the battlefield was wrong. What we get from religion in modern days is stuff like "sex is evil unless you're married," "gays can't be equals without making straight couples less special," and "abortion must be handled with an iron fist, rather than the gentle urging of a friend."

EDIT: Man. Copy and paste is not my friend today. Cleaned up.
Shiri2009-03-24 16:20:57
yeeeah split
Xavius2009-03-24 16:27:13
QUOTE (Shiri @ Mar 24 2009, 11:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
yeeeah split

laugh.gif
Saaga2009-03-24 16:30:27
QUOTE
What we get from religion in modern days is stuff like "sex is evil unless you're married," "gays can't be equals without making straight couples less special," and "abortion must be handled with an iron fist, rather than the gentle urging of a friend."


And these views are mostly from Christianity and some of the other religions that originate in the Near East, not religion in general. But yeah.

Read: Some branches of Christianity, some branches of other near-East religions.